The patch `Reply net unreachable ICMP message' had a bug.
A route whose type is blockhole or prohibit type is treated as
unreachable type. The case where err is set to ENETUNREACH should
be that no route is found in the routing table only.
Signed-off-by: Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL P
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 09:47:33 +0100
Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 06-12-2007 09:14, Mitsuru Chinen wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 08:49:47 +0100
> > Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On 06-12-2007 07:31, Mitsuru Chinen
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 08:49:47 +0100
Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 06-12-2007 07:31, Mitsuru Chinen wrote:
> > IPv4 stack doesn't reply any ICMP destination unreachable message
> > with net unreachable code when IP detagrams are being discarded
> &
IPv4 stack doesn't reply any ICMP destination unreachable message
with net unreachable code when IP detagrams are being discarded
because of no route could be found in the forwarding path.
Incidentally, IPv6 stack replies such ICMPv6 message in the similar
situation.
Signed-off-by: Mitsuru C
IPv6 stack doesn't increment OutNoRoutes counter when IP datagrams
is being discarded because no route could be found to transmit them
to their destination. IPv6 stack should increment the counter.
Incidentally, IPv4 stack increments that counter in such situation.
Signed-off-by: Mitsuru C
As the checksum verification is postponed till user calls recv or poll,
the inrementation of Udp6InErrors counter should be also postponed.
Currently, it is postponed in non-blocking operation case. However it
should be postponed in all case like the IPv4 code.
Signed-off-by: Mitsuru Chinen
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:42:57 +0800
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:05:45PM +0900, Mitsuru Chinen wrote:
> >
> > > > 1. udp6InDatagrams is incremented instead of udpInErrors
> > > > 2. In userland, recvfrom() replies an
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:53:28 +0800
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 03:33:20PM +0900, Mitsuru Chinen wrote:
> > Hello Herbert,
> >
> > Let me ask a question about this patch.
> > After this patch was applied, 2 of the protocol stac
EAGAIN.
recvfrom() wasn't aware of such a packet before.
Are these changes intentional?
Best Regards,
Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:20:10 +1100
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dave:
>
> [UDP6]: Restore sk_filter optimisa
While displaying ICMP out-going statistics as Out counters in
/proc/net/snmp, the memory location for ICMP in-coming statistics
was referred by mistake.
Acked-by: David L Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/ipv4/proc.c |2 +-
1 f
-by: Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 13 ++---
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 6d5c3c2..da8c79c 100644
--- a/net/
On Mon, 7 May 2007 20:29:05 +0900
Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 03 May 2007 03:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 10:05:13 +0900
> &g
On Thu, 03 May 2007 03:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 10:05:13 +0900
>
> > [IPV4] SNMP: Display new statistics at /proc/net/netstat
> >
> > This displays the sta
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:46:30 +0900
>
> > On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:14:36 +0900
> > Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:14:36 +0900
Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This displays the statistics specified in the updated IP-MIB RFC
> (RFC4293) at /proc/net/snmp. As new statistics are placed as the
> last elements, this change wouldn't affect netstat, net-snmp
A transmitted IP multicast datagram should be counted as OutMcastPkts.
By the same token, a transmitted IP broadcast datagram should be
counted as OutBcastPkts.
Signed-off-by: Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/ipv4/ip_output.c |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 del
This displays the statistics specified in the updated IP-MIB RFC
(RFC4293) at /proc/net/snmp. As new statistics are placed as the
last elements, this change wouldn't affect netstat, net-snmp, etc.
Signed-off-by: Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/ipv4/proc.c |6
A received IP multicast datagram should be counted as InMcastPkts.
By the same token, a received IP broadcast datagram should be
counted as InBcastPkts.
Signed-off-by: Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/ipv4/ip_input.c |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 del
The updated IP-MIB RFC (RFC4293) specifys new objects, InBcastPkts
and OutBcastPkts. This adds definitions for them.
Signed-off-by: Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/snmp.h |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/snmp.h b/i
An IP datagram which is being discarded because of no routes in the
forwarding path should be counted as InNoRoutes.
Signed-off-by: Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/ipv4/ip_input.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_input.c b/ne
An IP datagram which is being discarded because the datagram frame
didn't carry enough data should be counted as InTruncatedPkts.
Signed-off-by: Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/ipv4/ip_input.c |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
] SNMP: Display new statistics at /proc/net/snmp
Best Regards,
Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Incoming trancated packets are counted as not only InTruncatedPkts but
also InHdrErrors. They should be counted as InTruncatedPkts only.
Signed-off-by: Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/ipv6/ip6_input.c |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:54:38 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:47:56 +1100
>
> > Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On linux-2.6.21-rc2 o
te of the
actual link state.
Here's a work around patch. This make IF_READY unset when NETDEV_UP
event occurs and the link is not ready. This patch may not be an
fundamental fix. But I don't have any other idea now.
Signed-off-by: Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/ipv6/a
ils.
The test log is the same as the last one.
When I applied all patches, I got fails, either.
Best Regards,
--
Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
ed wrong tree...
Excuse me. I overlooked an error message from patch command.
When I appiled the patch manually, we could compile them.
We will double-check these patches with TAHI, either.
And then, we will report the results.
Best Regards,
--
Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_async-job-patch/nd.p2/
The fails occured at the same tests with the async job changeset.
Best Regards,
--
Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
28 matches
Mail list logo
