Re: Was change to ip_push_pending_frames intended to break udp (more specifically, WCCP?)

2006-05-23 Thread Paul P Komkoff Jr
Replying to David S. Miller: That's my position too and I'm pretty much going to ignore any request to change this behavior. Accorind to this article, some people count this as security issue: http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/427622 Well ... someone with Cisco support contract can open a

Re: Was change to ip_push_pending_frames intended to break udp (more specifically, WCCP?)

2006-05-22 Thread Paul P Komkoff Jr
Replying to Vlad Yasevich: /* This is only to work around buggy Windows95/2000 * VJ compression implementations. If the ID field * does not change, they drop every other packet in * a TCP stream using header compression. */ Unfortunately, cisco IOS also complains