Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] acpi: Add acpi mdio support code

2018-11-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, November 8, 2018 8:55:47 AM CET Wang, Dongsheng wrote: > On 2018/11/8 15:44, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, November 8, 2018 8:22:16 AM CET Wang Dongsheng wrote: > >> Add support for parsing the ACPI data node for PHY devices on an MDIO bus. > >>

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] acpi: Add acpi mdio support code

2018-11-07 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, November 8, 2018 8:22:16 AM CET Wang Dongsheng wrote: > Add support for parsing the ACPI data node for PHY devices on an MDIO bus. > The current implementation depend on mdio bus scan. > With _DSD device properties we can finally do this: > > Device (MDIO) { > Name (_DSD,

Re: [PATCH v6 10/18] x86/power/64: Remove VLA usage

2018-07-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 6:49 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this > removes the discouraged use of AHASH_REQUEST_ON_STACK by switching to > shash directly and allocating the descriptor in heap memory (which should > be fine: the tfm has

Re: [PATCH 15/39] acpi/battery: simplify procfs code

2018-04-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hellwig <h...@lst.de> It is OK AFAICS. Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>

Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 1/7] device property: Introduce fwnode_get_mac_address()

2018-01-23 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 7:12 AM, Marcin Wojtas wrote: > Hi Rafael, > >> > if (res) >> > return res; >> > >> > - return device_get_mac_addr(dev, "address", addr, alen); >> > + return fwnode_get_mac_addr(fwnode, "address", addr, alen); >> > +}

Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 4/7] device property: Allow iterating over available child fwnodes

2018-01-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
> This commit also introduces a macro, thanks to which it is > possible to iterate over the available fwnodes, using the > new function described above. > > Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <m...@semihalf.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.co

Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 1/7] device property: Introduce fwnode_get_mac_address()

2018-01-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
ode_get_mac_address(). This commit also changes > device_get_mac_address() routine to be its wrapper, in order > to prevent unnecessary duplication. > > Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <m...@semihalf.com> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > --- &

Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 3/7] device property: Introduce fwnode_irq_get()

2018-01-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Marcin Wojtas wrote: > Until now there were two very similar functions allowing > to get Linux IRQ number from ACPI handle (acpi_irq_get()) > and OF node (of_irq_get()). The first one appeared to be used > only as a subroutine of

Re: [net-next: PATCH v2 2/5] device property: Introduce fwnode_get_phy_mode()

2018-01-03 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
_mode(). This commit also changes > device_get_phy_mode() routine to be its wrapper, in order > to prevent unnecessary duplication. > > Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <m...@semihalf.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/base/propert

Re: ACPI issues on cold power on [bisected]

2018-01-03 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, January 3, 2018 11:38:12 AM CET Jonathan McDowell wrote: > On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 11:11:29AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 11:25:01AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 3:54 AM, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo@

Re: [net-next: PATCH v2 1/5] device property: Introduce fwnode_get_mac_address()

2018-01-03 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
dress(). This commit also changes > device_get_mac_address() routine to be its wrapper, in order > to prevent unnecessary duplication. > > Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <m...@semihalf.com> The changes look reasonable to me, so Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso

Re: ACPI issues on cold power on [bisected]

2018-01-02 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 3:54 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 04:36:59PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:21:09AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 03:11:59PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote: >> > > I've been

Re: [RFC PATCH v12 0/5] PCI: rockchip: Move PCIe WAKE# handling into pci core

2017-12-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, December 26, 2017 3:36:41 AM CET Jeffy Chen wrote: > > Currently we are handling wake irq in mrvl wifi driver. Move it into > pci core. > > Tested on my chromebook bob(with cros 4.4 kernel and mrvl wifi). > > > Changes in v13: > Fix compiler error reported by kbuild test robot

Re: [trivial PATCH] treewide: Align function definition open/close braces

2017-12-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
t raid6_calls raid6_sse2x2 = { > raid6_sse22_gen_syndrome, > @@ -366,9 +366,9 @@ static void raid6_sse24_gen_syndrome(int disks, size_t > bytes, void **ptrs) > kernel_fpu_end(); > } > > - static void raid6_sse24_xor_syndrome(int disks, int start, int stop, > +static void raid6_sse24_xor_syndrome(int disks, int start, int stop, >size_t bytes, void **ptrs) > - { > +{ > u8 **dptr = (u8 **)ptrs; > u8 *p, *q; > int d, z, z0; > @@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static void raid6_sse24_gen_syndrome(int disks, size_t > bytes, void **ptrs) > } > asm volatile("sfence" : : : "memory"); > kernel_fpu_end(); > - } > +} > > > const struct raid6_calls raid6_sse2x4 = { > diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_dma.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_dma.c > index 0c11f434a374..ec619f51d336 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_dma.c > +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_dma.c > @@ -879,7 +879,7 @@ static const struct snd_pcm_ops fsl_dma_ops = { > }; > > static int fsl_soc_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > - { > +{ > struct dma_object *dma; > struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > struct device_node *ssi_np; > > -- Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> for the ACPI part. Thanks!

Re: [net-next: PATCH 0/8] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

2017-12-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On 12/18/2017 10:17 AM, Marcin Wojtas wrote: Hi, This patchset introduces ACPI support in mvpp2 and mvmdio drivers. First three patches introduce fwnode helpers for obtaining PHY information from nodes and also MDIO fwnode API for registering the bus with its PHY/devices. Following patches

Re: [RFC PATCH v10 0/7] PCI: rockchip: Move PCIe WAKE# handling into pci core

2017-10-28 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, October 27, 2017 9:26:05 AM CEST Jeffy Chen wrote: > > Currently we are handling wake irq in mrvl wifi driver. Move it into > pci core. > > Tested on my chromebook bob(with cros 4.4 kernel and mrvl wifi). > > > Changes in v10: > Use device_set_wakeup_capable() instead of

Re: [PATCH v2 09/15] ACPI: configfs: make config_item_type const

2017-10-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
able_group_ops, > }; > > -static struct config_item_type acpi_root_group_type = { > +static const struct config_item_type acpi_root_group_type = { > .ct_owner = THIS_MODULE, > }; > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>

Re: r8169 Wake-on-LAN causes immediate ACPI GPE wakeup

2017-10-05 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > On the Acer laptop models Aspire ES1-533, Aspire ES1-732, PackardBell > ENTE69AP and Gateway NE533, we are seeing a problem where the system > immediately wakes up after being put into S3 suspend. > > This problem

Re: [PATCH 31/31] timer: Switch to testing for .function instead of .data

2017-09-02 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, September 1, 2017 1:29:43 AM CEST Kees Cook wrote: > In several places, .data is checked for initialization to gate early > calls to del_timer_sync(). Checking for .function is equally valid, so > switch to this in all callers. > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"

Re: [PATCH 1/6] ACPI: make device_attribute const

2017-08-28 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, August 21, 2017 1:43:07 PM CEST Bhumika Goyal wrote: > Make these const as they are only passed as an argument to the function > device_create_file and device_remove_file and the corresponding > arguments are of type const. > Done using Coccinelle > > Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal

Re: [PATCH 0/6] drivers: make device_attribute const

2017-08-21 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Bhumika Goyal wrote: > Make these const. Done using Coccinelle. > > @match disable optional_qualifier@ > identifier s; > @@ > static struct device_attribute s = {...}; > > @ref@ > position p; > identifier match.s; > @@ > s@p > > @good1@ >

Re: [PATCH 00/35] treewide trivial patches converting pr_warning to pr_warn

2017-02-17 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > There are ~4300 uses of pr_warn and ~250 uses of the older > pr_warning in the kernel source tree. > > Make the use of pr_warn consistent across all kernel files. > > This excludes all files in tools/ as there is a separate >

Re: [PATCH] net: smsc911x: Synchronize the runtime PM status during system suspend

2016-10-31 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, October 27, 2016 01:53:03 PM Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 27 October 2016 at 13:41, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Ulf, > > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > >> The smsc911c driver puts its device into low power

Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 00/13] net: hns: add support of ACPI

2016-06-03 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, June 03, 2016 10:55:08 AM Yisen Zhuang wrote: > From: Kejian Yan > > This series adds HNS support of acpi. The routine will call some ACPI > helper functions, like acpi_dev_found() and acpi_evaluate_dsm(), which > are not included in other cases. In order to make

Re: [RFC][PATCH] tags: Fix DEFINE_PER_CPU expansions

2016-03-01 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
acpi_processor_cx * [CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX], > - acpi_cstate); > +static > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_processor_cx * [CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX], acpi_cstate); > > static int disabled_by_idle_boot_param(void) > { For the above: Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>

Re: [PATCH] tree wide: Use kvfree() than conditional kfree()/vfree()

2015-11-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, November 09, 2015 08:56:10 PM Tetsuo Handa wrote: > There are many locations that do > > if (memory_was_allocated_by_vmalloc) > vfree(ptr); > else > kfree(ptr); > > but kvfree() can handle both kmalloc()ed memory and vmalloc()ed memory > using is_vmalloc_addr(). Unless

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Convert smsc911x to use ACPI as well as DT

2015-10-07 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On 10/6/2015 1:08 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 17:20 -0700, Charles Garcia-Tobin wrote: it in ACPI circles unless we had wider agreement among OSs to use it. AFAIK PRP1 has not actually been approved yet in the specification forum, and that it in itself is more of a

Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock'

2015-09-28 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, September 28, 2015 10:24:58 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Sunday 27 September 2015 16:10:48 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Saturday, September 26, 2015 09:33:56 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Saturday 26 September 2015 11:40:00 Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > >

Re: [PATCH V5 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock'

2015-09-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
h platforms yet, but the > code needs to be robust for such a case. > > Fix that by changing type of 'global_lock' to u32. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> Greg, please take this one along wi

Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock'

2015-09-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, September 26, 2015 12:52:08 PM James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 22:58 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, September 25, 2015 01:25:49 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > On 25 September 2015 at 13:33, Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@rjwyso

Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock'

2015-09-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, September 26, 2015 09:33:56 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 26 September 2015 11:40:00 Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 25 September 2015 at 15:19, Rafael J. Wysocki <raf...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > So if you allow something like debugfs to update your structur

Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock'

2015-09-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, September 25, 2015 01:25:49 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 25 September 2015 at 13:33, Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > > You're going to change that into bool in the next patch, right? > > Yeah. > > > So what if bool is a byte and the fiel

Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock'

2015-09-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
; code needs to be robust for such a case. > > Fix that by passing a local variable to debugfs_create_bool() and > assigning its value to global_lock later. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>

Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock'

2015-09-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, September 25, 2015 10:18:13 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, September 25, 2015 09:41:37 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > global_lock is defined as an unsigned long and accessing only its lower > > 32 bits from sysfs is incorrect, as we need to consider other 32 b

Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock'

2015-09-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, September 25, 2015 11:52:56 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 25-09-15, 20:49, Johannes Berg wrote: > > Ok, then, but that means Rafael is completely wrong ... > > debugfs_create_bool() takes a *pointer* and it needs to be long-lived, > > it can't be on the stack. You also don't get a call

Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock'

2015-09-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, September 25, 2015 10:26:22 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, September 25, 2015 11:52:56 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 25-09-15, 20:49, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > Ok, then, but that means Rafael is completely wrong ... > > > debugfs_create_bool() tak

Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock'

2015-09-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 25-09-15, 22:58, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> Say you have three adjacent fields in a structure, x, y, z, each one byte >> long. >> Initially, all of them are equal to 0. >> >&g

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Convert smsc911x to use ACPI as well as DT

2015-09-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On 9/25/2015 5:28 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 07:10:38PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 16:15 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: With "PRP0001", they can skip the _DSD properties review process (not that they bother much currently) as long as the existing

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Convert smsc911x to use ACPI as well as DT

2015-09-23 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On 9/23/2015 8:41 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 17:06 -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote: +static const struct acpi_device_id smsc911x_acpi_match[] = { + { "ARMH9118", 0 }, + { } +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, smsc911x_acpi_match); + static struct platform_driver

Re: [PATCH -next v2 1/2] device property: Return -ENXIO if there is no suitable FW interface

2015-08-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 01:20:44 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: Return -ENXIO if device property array access functions don't find a suitable firmware interface. This lets drivers decide if they should use available platform data instead. Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com

Re: [PATCH -next v2 1/2] device property: Return -ENXIO if there is no suitable FW interface

2015-08-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 04:25:59 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: On 08/26/2015 04:37 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 01:20:44 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: Return -ENXIO if device property array access functions don't find a suitable firmware interface. This lets

Re: [PATCH 2/2] net, thunder, bgx: Add support for ACPI binding.

2015-08-07 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi Mark, On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote: [Correcting the devicetree list address, which I typo'd in my original reply] +static const char * const addr_propnames[] = { + mac-address, + local-mac-address, + address, +}; If these are going

Re: [PATCH 2/2] net, thunder, bgx: Add support for ACPI binding.

2015-08-07 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi David, On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:11 AM, David Daney dda...@caviumnetworks.com wrote: On 08/07/2015 05:05 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [cut] It is actually useful to people as far as I can say. Also, if somebody is going to use properties with ACPI, why whould they use a different set

Re: [PATCH 2/2] net, thunder, bgx: Add support for ACPI binding.

2015-08-07 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi David, On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 8:14 PM, David Daney dda...@caviumnetworks.com wrote: On 08/07/2015 07:54 AM, Graeme Gregory wrote: On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 05:33:10PM -0700, David Daney wrote: From: David Daney david.da...@cavium.com Find out which PHYs belong to which BGX instance in the

Re: [PATCH 1/5] device property: helper macros for property entry creation

2015-08-07 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, August 06, 2015 10:48:48 AM Heikki Krogerus wrote: On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 05:02:18PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 16:39 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus

Re: [V5 PATCH 1/5] ACPI / scan: Parse _CCA and setup device coherency

2015-05-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
); + Well, so is this going to work for PCI too after all? acpi_physnode_link_name(physical_node_name, node_id); retval = sysfs_create_link(acpi_dev-dev.kobj, dev-kobj, physical_node_name); -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open

Re: [V5 PATCH 1/5] ACPI / scan: Parse _CCA and setup device coherency

2015-05-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, May 22, 2015 07:15:17 PM Suravee Suthikulanit wrote: On 5/22/2015 6:05 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Friday, May 22, 2015 05:24:15 PM Suravee Suthikulanit wrote: Not sure if this went out earlier. So I am resending. On 5/22/15 16:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: diff --git

Re: [V5 PATCH 1/5] ACPI / scan: Parse _CCA and setup device coherency

2015-05-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, May 22, 2015 05:24:15 PM Suravee Suthikulanit wrote: Not sure if this went out earlier. So I am resending. On 5/22/15 16:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: diff --git a/drivers/acpi/glue.c b/drivers/acpi/glue.c index 39c485b..b9657af 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/glue.c +++ b/drivers

Re: [V4 PATCH 1/6] ACPI / scan: Parse _CCA and setup device coherency

2015-05-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, May 18, 2015 05:38:17 PM Suravee Suthikulanit wrote: Hi Rafael, On 5/15/2015 6:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Friday, May 15, 2015 04:23:09 PM Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: [...] diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c index 4bf7559

Re: keyboard dead with 45b5035

2008-02-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 18 of February 2008, Pierre Ossman wrote: The patch [RTNETLINK]: Send a single notification on device state changes. kills (at least) the keyboard here. Everything seems to work fine in single user mode, but when init starts spawning of logins, the keyboard goes bye-bye. Even the

Re: Subject: [PATCH] Revert [RTNETLINK]: Send a single notification on device state changes.

2008-02-17 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 18 of February 2008, Jiri Kosina wrote: This reverts commit 45b503548210fe6f23e92b856421c2a3f05fd034. It contains deadlock, and breaks userspace applications (wpa_supplicant, networkmanager). References: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10002

Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9721] New: wake on lan fails with sky2 module

2008-01-13 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 13 of January 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: 2.6.23 also has this warning in sky2_err_intr() but it doesn't trigger there. Rafael, I think we'd have to class this as a post-2.6.23 regression. Yes, it's been being tracked already. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9721] New: wake on lan fails with sky2 module

2008-01-13 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
I wonder if commit 84cd2dfb04d23a961c5f537baa243fa54d0987ac sky2: remove check for PCI wakeup setting from BIOS has anything to do with it, btw. supersud501, can you please check if the bug is still present in the current Linus' tree? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9721] New: wake on lan fails with sky2 module

2008-01-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9721 On Saturday, 12 of January 2008, supersud501 wrote: I'll do the git-bisect (just downloading linux-2.6.git), but i forgot to mention one little thing: i'm using x64 version of kernel - does this play an important role? No, it doesn't. -- To

Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9721] New: wake on lan fails with sky2 module

2008-01-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9721 On Friday, 11 of January 2008, supersud501 wrote: Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:03:00 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web

Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9721] New: wake on lan fails with sky2 module

2008-01-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, 11 of January 2008, supersud501 wrote: Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9721 allright, didn't see that before, sorry, here are the results: kernel 2.6.23.12 acpi=off: when shutting down the system doesn't poweroff (of course), but pressing

Re: Top 10 kernel oopses for the week ending January 5th, 2008

2008-01-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 8 of January 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote: ok done; I had to fizzle a bit because some things aren't *exactly* a BUG() statement but I track them anyway (things like the sleeping in invalid context check), so I had to somewhat

Re: [BUG] lack of /proc/net/ax25 with 2.6.24-rc5

2007-12-17 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 16 of December 2007, Bernard Pidoux wrote: With 2.6.24-rc5 there is no /proc/net/ax25 FYI, I've created a Bugzilla entry for this issue at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9589 Please add your address to the CC list in there. Thanks, Rafael Here is an extract from

Re: Regression: Wireshark sees no packets in 2.6.24-rc3

2007-12-14 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, 14 of December 2007, Ray Lee wrote: tshark -i eth0, eth1, lo are all empty. Works under 2.6.23.0 just fine. A quick scan of the log between 2.6.24-rc3 and current tip (-rc5) doesn't show any obvious fixes, but then again, what do I know. I'll check current tip on the weekend when

Re: 2.6.24-rc3: find complains about /proc/net

2007-11-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, 21 of November 2007, Roland McGrath wrote: can you see any danger to providing a /proc/self_task/ link? (or can you think of a better name/API/approach) That is a poor name to choose given /proc/self/task exists as something else (just try writing a sentence comparing them

Re: 2.6.24-rc3: find complains about /proc/net

2007-11-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 of November 2007, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! I think that this worked before: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/proc# find . -name timer_info find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for ./net: this may be a bug in your filesystem driver. Automatically turning on find's -noleaf option.

Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

2007-11-13 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 13 of November 2007, Mark Lord wrote: Matthew Wilcox wrote: On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:43:53PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: mkdir t cd t git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git (wait half an hour) /usr/bin/du -s linux-2.6 522732

Re: 2.6.24-rc1-gb4f5550 oops

2007-11-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote: On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 01:06:21 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday, 5 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote: Hi, I got this oops on 2.6.24-rc1-641-gb4f5550: (1) Is this reproducible? (2) Did it happen

Re: 2.6.24-rc1-gb4f5550 oops

2007-11-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote: On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:53:10 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote: On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 01:06:21 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday, 5

Re: 2.6.24-rc1-gb4f5550 oops

2007-11-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote: On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 22:42:21 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote: On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:53:10 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday, 8

Re: 2.6.22-rc4 hibernate disables skge wol

2007-06-15 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, 15 June 2007 23:50, David Greaves wrote: I've started a new thread here since the old one got somewhat hijacked. Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Friday, 1 June 2007 23:23, David Greaves wrote: Not a regression though, it does it in 2.6.21 If I cause the system to save state

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add suspend and resume support to uli526x

2007-06-05 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 5 June 2007 07:56, Stephen Hemminger wrote: I hope soon to add suspend/resume to the network device class and remove driver specific suspend/resume from lots of devices. The class suspend routine would just be: pci_save_state dev-stop resume is

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add suspend and resume support to uli526x

2007-06-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, On Monday, 4 June 2007 13:11, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Add suspend/resume support to the uli526x network driver (tested on x86_64, with 'Ethernet controller: ALi Corporation M5263 Ethernet Controller, rev 40'). Signed-off-by: Rafael

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add suspend and resume support to uli526x

2007-06-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, On Monday, 4 June 2007 23:16, Nigel Cunningham wrote: Hi. On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 15:49 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday, 4 June 2007 13:11, Pavel Machek wrote: From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Add suspend/resume support to the uli526x network driver (tested

[RFC][PATCH] Add suspend and resume support to uli526x

2007-06-03 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Add suspend/resume support to the uli526x network driver (tested on x86_64, with 'Ethernet controller: ALi Corporation M5263 Ethernet Controller, rev 40'). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c | 120

[PATCH] Attempt to add suspend/resume support to uli526x

2007-03-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, The uli526x network driver doesn't implement .suspend and .resume methods and the interface handled by it is unuseable after the resume. Since I have one of these boards in a box which is used to test the suspend/resume functionality, I've prepared the appended patch that adds the .suspend

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix loss of association after resume

2007-02-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, 9 February 2007 17:53, Michael Buesch wrote: On Friday 09 February 2007 17:18, Larry Finger wrote: After a suspend/resume cycle, bcm43xx-softmac has lost its association with the AP and requires manual intervention. This situation is fixed by making one of softmac's internal

Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix scaling error for 'iwlist rate' information

2007-01-23 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:26, Larry Finger wrote: The bcm43xx scales the rate information supplied to a WE iwlist rate call incorrectly. Signed-off-by: Larry Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- John, This fix should be applied to wireless-2.6. As it is a bug fix, it could also be sent

Re: bcm43xx from 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 on HPC nx6325 (x86_64)

2006-12-23 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, On Friday, 22 December 2006 18:30, Larry Finger wrote: I'm trying to make the bcm43xx driver out of the 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 kernel work on an HPC nx6325, with no luck, so far, although I'm using a firmware that has been reported to work with these boxes

Re: 2.6.19-rc6-mm2: Network device naming starts at 1 instead of 0

2006-12-05 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 5 December 2006 23:07, Auke Kok wrote: [resend] Quick note: I loaded up 2.6.19-rc6-mm2 on a platform here and noticed that the onboard e1000 NIC was enumerated to eth1 instead of eth0. on 2.6.18.5 and any other kernel I used before, it was properly named eth0 after startup.

Re: 2.6.19-rc6-mm2: uli526x only works after reload

2006-12-01 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, 1 December 2006 02:20, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 06:18:09PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 02:04:15 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: git-netdev-all.patch git-netdev-all-fixup.patch libphy-dont-do-that.patch

Re: 2.6.19-rc6-mm2: uli526x only works after reload

2006-11-30 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 02:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Thursday, 30 November 2006 00:26, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:08:21 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wednesday, 29

Re: 2.6.19-rc6-mm2: uli526x only works after reload

2006-11-30 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
[Trimmed the Cc list a bit.] On Thursday, 30 November 2006 22:12, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:21:27 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday, 30 November 2006 02:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Thursday, 30 November 2006 00:26, Andrew Morton wrote

Re: 2.6.19-rc6-mm2: uli526x only works after reload

2006-11-30 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 22:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [Trimmed the Cc list a bit.] On Thursday, 30 November 2006 22:12, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:21:27 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday, 30 November 2006 02:04, Rafael J. Wysocki

Re: 2.6.19-rc6-mm2: uli526x only works after reload

2006-11-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:30, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:08:00 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 20:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tuesday, 28 November 2006 11:02, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily

Re: 2.6.19-rc6-mm2: uli526x only works after reload

2006-11-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:30, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:08:00 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 20:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tuesday, 28

Re: 2.6.19-rc6-mm2: uli526x only works after reload

2006-11-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 00:26, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:08:21 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:30, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:08

Re: 2.6.18.1 hangs after resuming from apm suspend

2006-10-23 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 23 October 2006 09:47, Christian stahl wrote: After upgrading from 2.6.16.20 to 2.6.18.1 my Siemens Scenic Mobile 750AGP Notebook hangs after resuming from suspend. However resuming from suspend works properly if: - the prism 2.5 WLAN card is removed before suspending - the

Re: tg3 kernel bug in 2.6.18-mm3 and 2.6.19-rc2-mm2

2006-10-21 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, 21 October 2006 19:02, Andrew Morton wrote: cc's added. On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 15:22:39 +0200 Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all! I get the same bug again and again, always when ifplugd is started: tg3: eth0: No firmware running. BUG: soft lockup

Re: Bcm43xx softMac Driver in 2.6.18

2006-09-23 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, 23 September 2006 08:03, Ray Lee wrote: On 9/22/06, Larry Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When we found the cause of NETDEV watchdog timeouts in the wireless-2.6 code, I knew that the 2.6.18 release code would cause a serious regression. I don't know if this is the lockup

Re: 2.6.18-rc7-mm1

2006-09-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 16:23, Mike Galbraith wrote: On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 13:36 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:25:21 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - It took maybe ten hours solid work to get this dogpile vaguely compiling

Re: 2.6.18-rc7-mm1: networking breakage on HPC nx6325 + SUSE 10.1

2006-09-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 19 September 2006 22:36, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:25:21 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - It took maybe ten hours solid work to get this dogpile vaguely compiling and limping to a login prompt on x86, x86_64 and powerpc. I guess

Re: 2.6.18-rc7-mm1: networking breakage on HPC nx6325 + SUSE 10.1

2006-09-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 19 September 2006 23:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tuesday, 19 September 2006 22:36, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:25:21 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - It took maybe ten hours solid work to get this dogpile vaguely compiling

Re: 2.6.18-rc7-mm1: networking breakage on HPC nx6325 + SUSE 10.1

2006-09-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 00:30, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:06:29PM -0700, David Miller wrote: From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:06:52 +0200 I _guess_ the problem is caused by gregkh-driver-network-class_device-to-device.patch

Re: 2.6.18-rc4-mm1: eth0: trigger_send() called with the transmitter busy

2006-08-15 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 01:01, Laurent Riffard wrote: Le 14.08.2006 23:25, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit : On Monday 14 August 2006 22:06, Laurent Riffard wrote: Le 14.08.2006 19:47, Laurent Riffard a écrit : Le 14.08.2006 18:50, Andrew Morton a écrit : On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:38:47 +0200

Re: 2.6.18-rc4-mm1: eth0: trigger_send() called with the transmitter busy

2006-08-15 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 17:38, Laurent Riffard wrote: Le 15.08.2006 12:10, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit : On Tuesday 15 August 2006 01:01, Laurent Riffard wrote: Le 14.08.2006 23:25, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit : On Monday 14 August 2006 22:06, Laurent Riffard wrote: Le 14.08.2006 19:47

Re: 2.6.18-rc4-mm1: eth0: trigger_send() called with the transmitter busy

2006-08-14 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday 14 August 2006 22:06, Laurent Riffard wrote: Le 14.08.2006 19:47, Laurent Riffard a écrit : Le 14.08.2006 18:50, Andrew Morton a écrit : On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:38:47 +0200 Laurent Riffard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le 13.08.2006 10:24, Andrew Morton a __crit :

Re: 2.6.18-rc3-mm2 (+ hotfixes): GPF related to skge on suspend

2006-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday 12 August 2006 15:39, Jeff Garzik wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: It would be good if you could poke around in gdb, work out exactly which statement it's oopsing at, please. I'm also interested to know if the problem goes away when you disable preempt... That will take some time

2.6.18-rc3-mm2 (+ hotfixes): GPF related to skge on suspend

2006-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, On 2.6.18-rc3-mm2 with hotfixes I get things like the appended one on attempts to suspend to disk. It occurs while devices are being suspended and is fairly reproducible. Greetings, Rafael Suspending device :01:00.0 Suspending device :02:02.0 Suspending device :02:01.4

Re: 2.6.18-rc3-mm2 (+ hotfixes): GPF related to skge on suspend

2006-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday 12 August 2006 14:28, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:07:42 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On 2.6.18-rc3-mm2 with hotfixes I get things like the appended one on attempts to suspend to disk. It occurs while devices are being suspended

Re: 2.6.18-rc3-mm2 (+ hotfixes): GPF related to skge on suspend

2006-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday 12 August 2006 18:12, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 04:31:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Saturday 12 August 2006 14:28, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:07:42 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On 2.6.18

Re: 2.6.18-rc3-mm2 (+ hotfixes): GPF related to skge on suspend

2006-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday 12 August 2006 16:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Saturday 12 August 2006 15:39, Jeff Garzik wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: It would be good if you could poke around in gdb, work out exactly which statement it's oopsing at, please. I'm also interested to know if the problem

Re: 2.6.18-rc3-mm2 (+ hotfixes): GPF related to skge on suspend

2006-08-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday 12 August 2006 20:16, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 07:13:01PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Apparently it doesn't. Hi, could you try and see if this helps? With the patch I can't reproduce the problem. I sometimes get the error messages from the interrupt

Re: Using netconsole for debugging suspend/resume

2006-06-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday 09 June 2006 03:56, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Please try doing echo 8 /proc/sys/kernel/printk before suspend. Um, why? That would increase the amount of log output, but I don't see how it would help with netconsole preventing suspend, or not being

Re: Using netconsole for debugging suspend/resume

2006-06-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday 08 June 2006 19:50, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: I've been trying to get suspend/resume working well on my new laptop. In general, netconsole has been pretty useful for extracting oopses and other messages, but it is of more limited help in debugging the actual suspend/resume

  1   2   >