On 8 December 2017 at 18:41, Simon Guinot wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 12:06:12PM +0100, Sean Nyekjær wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> >> I'm not sure at all, but could you try to apply
>> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/li
Hi
>> I'm not sure at all, but could you try to apply
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=0d63785c6b94b5d2f095f90755825f90eea791f5
>> and see if the problem is resolved ?>
> I will apply the patch right away, and report back.
>
The same issue reappeare
On 27 November 2017 at 10:00, Thomas Petazzoni
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> +Grégory Clement, Antoine Ténart, Simon Guinot, Marcin Wojtas.
>
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 09:47:10 +0100, Sean Nyekjær wrote:
>
>> I see you are the maintainer on mvneta :-)
>> I have an Espressobin boa
Hi Thomas
I see you are the maintainer on mvneta :-)
I have an Espressobin board, i'm currently running with archlinux for
arm. I have been running with 4.13.x mainline, 4.13.x with arch
patches, 4.14.0 mainline and 4.14.1 with arch patches.
You can see what patches that are applied here:
https:/
On 2017-01-27 19:55, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 01/26/2017 11:46 PM, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
This is adds support for the PHYs in the KSZ8795 5port managed switch.
It will allow to detect the link between the switch and the soc
and uses the same read_status functions as the KSZ8873MLL switch.
S
On 2017-01-26 19:12, Andrew Lunn wrote:
I remove the word "Switch" from the commit message and phy name.
The rest is okay?
Yes.
What is generally being done when to phy's have the same id, micrel
have done this many times...
It should not be a problem. When you write a switch driver for the
On 2017-01-23 16:12, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 08:58:46AM +0100, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
This is add support for the PHYs in the KSZ8795 5port managed switch.
It will allow to detect the link between the switch and the soc
and uses the same read_status functions as the KSZ8873ML
On 2017-01-20 15:17, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 01:50:49PM +0100, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
This ethernet switch have unfortunately the same phy id as KSZ8051.
Hi Sean
Please could you explain some more. You are adding PHY support here,
not switch support. So is this to enable the
