Rick Jones wrote:
It _would_ be very interesting to see if disabling tcp_abc does
workaround the problem.
Yes it does, we tried that first. Then we reenabled tcp_abc and
increased the toolkit keep_alive. Either method works around the issue
from our point of view.
---
John
-
To unsubscr
Rick Jones wrote:
Skunk Worx wrote:
Rick Jones wrote:
From strace :
15:27:04.568800 recv(3, "555, ) = 555 <0.000121>
vs.
15:18:24.515891 recv(3, "566, ) = 566 <0.038414>
Will watch replies and post more when I know more. Kinda new at this.
Do you have the s
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:13:01 -0800
Skunk Worx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I've taken a performance hit over localhost between kernels 2.6.14 and
2.6.15 in my client/server application.
This came up with java debugging already. The problem
Rick Jones wrote:
From strace :
15:27:04.568800 recv(3, ") = 555 <0.000121>
vs.
15:18:24.515891 recv(3, ") = 566 <0.038414>
Will watch replies and post more when I know more. Kinda new at this.
Do you have the strace from the sending side?
Yes...I hope I'm not posting too much info
Hello,
I've taken a performance hit over localhost between kernels 2.6.14 and
2.6.15 in my client/server application.
I'm trying to gut things down to a simple test case, in the meantime,
this is what I've been discussing with the people at the fedora test list :
This is only over localhost
