Re: [RFC bpf-next 7/7] samples/bpf: add busy-poll support to xdpsock sample

2019-05-23 Thread Ye Xiaolong
Hi, Magnus On 05/02, Magnus Karlsson wrote: >This patch adds busy-poll support to the xdpsock sample >application. It is enabled by the "-b" or the "--busy-poll" command >line options. > >Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson >--- > samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c | 203 --

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/3] libbpf: add support for using AF_XDP sockets

2019-02-20 Thread Ye Xiaolong
Hi Magnus On 02/19, Magnus Karlsson wrote: [snip] >+static int xsk_setup_xdp_prog(struct xsk_socket *xsk) >+{ >+ bool prog_attached = false; >+ __u32 prog_id = 0; >+ int err; >+ >+ err = bpf_get_link_xdp_id(xsk->ifindex, &prog_id, >+xsk->config.x

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH net-next 2/2] sctp: add sctp_make_op_error_limited and reuse inner functions

2018-05-14 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 05/14, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 07:47:20PM +0800, Ye Xiaolong wrote: >> On 05/14, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> >On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 03:40:53PM +0800, Ye Xiaolong wrote: >> >> >> config: x86_64-randconfig-x006-201817 (at

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH net-next 2/2] sctp: add sctp_make_op_error_limited and reuse inner functions

2018-05-14 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 05/14, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 03:40:53PM +0800, Ye Xiaolong wrote: >> >> config: x86_64-randconfig-x006-201817 (attached as .config) >> >> compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0 >> >> reproduce: >> >>

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH net-next 2/2] sctp: add sctp_make_op_error_limited and reuse inner functions

2018-05-14 Thread Ye Xiaolong
Sorry for the late response. On 04/29, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:14:06AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: >> Hi Marcelo, >> >> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: >> >> [auto build test ERROR on net-next/master] >> >> url: >> https://github.com/0

Re: [LKP] [bpf] 3ea693a925: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel

2017-10-25 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 10/25, Ye Xiaolong wrote: >On 10/25, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:53:23AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: >>> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-6): >>> >>> commit: 3ea693a925e14c1fc54c7d8bebe6f9fd9441b47d ("

Re: [LKP] [bpf] 3ea693a925: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel

2017-10-25 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 10/25, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:53:23AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: >> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-6): >> >> commit: 3ea693a925e14c1fc54c7d8bebe6f9fd9441b47d ("bpf: introduce new bpf >> cpu map type BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP") >> url: >> htt

Re: [lkp-robot] [irda] 66d98e78e4: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel

2017-08-29 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 08/30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 02:04:11PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: >> FYI, we noticed the following commit: >> >> commit: 66d98e78e44ccb969cb3196995759d200e64b49b ("irda: move net/irda/ to >> drivers/staging/irda/net/") >> url: >> https://github.com/0day-ci/l

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH net-next] networking: use skb_put_zero()

2017-06-16 Thread Ye Xiaolong
Hi, David On 06/13, David Miller wrote: > >These are bogus reports I think. > >Johannes's changes depends upon the wireless GIT tree I pulled in >right before I applied his patch. Did you applied the patch on top of master branch? Thanks, Xiaolong >__

Re: [LKP] [rhashtable] 5d60de5ff1 [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]

2017-02-27 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 02/25, Herbert Xu wrote: >On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 01:23:31PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> 0day kernel testing robot got the below dmesg and the first bad commit is >> >> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux >> Herbert-Xu/rhashtable-Handle-table-allocation-failure-during-insertio

Re: [lkp-robot] [tcp] e70ac17165: WARNING:at_kernel/softirq.c:#__local_bh_enable_ip

2017-02-20 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 02/20, Eric Dumazet wrote: >On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 6:11 PM, kernel test robot > wrote: >> >> FYI, we noticed the following commit: >> >> commit: e70ac171658679ecf6bea4bbd9e9325cd6079d2b ("tcp: tcp_probe: use >> spin_lock_bh()") >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git

Re: [LKP] [net] 34fad54c25: kernel BUG at include/linux/skbuff.h:1935!

2016-11-23 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 11/22, Linus Torvalds wrote: >On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 02:04:42PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> >>> I also noticed that the kernel test robot had screwed up the >>> participants list for some reason, and had >>> >>> "Acked-by: Alexan

Re: [LKP] [net] 2ab9fb18c4: kernel BUG at include/linux/skbuff.h:1935!

2016-11-13 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 11/14, Fengguang Wu wrote: >>>Hi guys. >>> >>>I took a look at the commit again and I do not see how this can happen. >>> >>>Are you sure patch was properly applied ? >>> >>>In particular, the following extract is obscure for me : >>> >>> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux Eric-Dumazet/ne

Re: [net] 2ab9fb18c4: kernel BUG at include/linux/skbuff.h:1935!

2016-11-13 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 11/13, Eric Dumazet wrote: >On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 07:49 +0800, kernel test robot wrote: >> FYI, we noticed the following commit: > > >> in testcase: kbuild >> with following parameters: >> >> runtime: 300s >> nr_task: 50% >> cpufreq_governor: performance >> >> >> >> >> on tes

Re: [lkp] [net] af1fee9821: BUG:spinlock_trylock_failure_on_UP_on_CPU

2016-11-07 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 11/07, Allan W. Nielsen wrote: >Hi, > >I tried to get this "lkp" up and running, but I had some troubles gettting >these scripts to work. Hi, Allan Could you tell us what troubles you have met when trying the "lkp qemu" tool, it would be better if you could paste some log so we can help to imp