Hi, Miller
Would you like to check this patch?
Thanks a lot.
Zhu Yanjun
On 06/26/2015 05:37 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
The new net namespace can inherit from the original net config, or
the current net config. As such, a config is needed to decide where
the new namespace inherit from.
Signed-off-b
On 09/01/2015 04:23 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 09/01/2015 09:10 AM, yzhu1 wrote:
On 09/01/2015 03:00 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: yzhu1
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 14:46:38 +0800
After I applied this patch, the skb->xmit_more is not always zero.
There have been thousands upon thousands
On 09/01/2015 03:00 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: yzhu1
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 14:46:38 +0800
After I applied this patch, the skb->xmit_more is not always zero.
There have been thousands upon thousands of commits since that
change.
You should be testing the tree as it currently stands,
On 08/26/2014 07:35 AM, David Miller wrote:
As reported by Jesper Dangaard Brouer, for high packet rates the
overhead of having another indirect call in the TX path is
non-trivial.
There is the indirect call itself, and then there is all of the
reloading of the state to refetch the tail pointer
Hi,
You can use netfilter to mirror the packets to another nic. Then you can
capture these cloned patckets on this nic.
It can not affect the performance. Believe me, I made tests with it.
Zhu Yanjun
On 05/20/2015 09:13 PM, Deniz Eren wrote:
Hi,
I'm having problem with packet capturing perfo
Hi, David
This patch is applied in our linux for a long time. It should work well.
Would you like to let me know your advice about this patch?
Thanks a lot.
Zhu Yanjun
On 06/26/2015 05:37 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
The new net namespace can inherit from the original net config, or
the current net
Hi, all
Some expect the new net namespace inherits from the original net config.
Some expect the new net namespace
inherits from the current net config, including the modified net
configurations.
To meet the different reqirements, this patch is made.
I think maybe mainline should need this p
