Re: [2.6 patch] make CONFIG_UNIX a bool

2006-04-10 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
On 4/9/06, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 21:53:39 +0200 > > > CONFIG_UNIX=m doesn't make that much sense and requires us to export > > things we don't want to export to modules. > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL P

Re: [2.6 patch] make CONFIG_UNIX a bool

2006-04-09 Thread David S. Miller
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 21:53:39 +0200 > CONFIG_UNIX=m doesn't make that much sense and requires us to export > things we don't want to export to modules. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I disagree. Every protocol module shoule be able to

[2.6 patch] make CONFIG_UNIX a bool

2006-04-09 Thread Adrian Bunk
CONFIG_UNIX=m doesn't make that much sense and requires us to export things we don't want to export to modules. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- fs/file_table.c|1 - include/net/af_unix.h |2 -- net/unix/Kconfig |6 +- net/unix/af_un