On Wednesday 16 November 2005 01:45, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> Alternatively, we're ignoring the PMTU message for one reason or
> another. Perhaps the quoted TCP packet in the ICMP pmtu message
> has an incorrect sequence number or is truncated for some reason.
There are counters for all of th
David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Alternatively, we're ignoring the PMTU message for one reason or
> another. Perhaps the quoted TCP packet in the ICMP pmtu message
> has an incorrect sequence number or is truncated for some reason.
That's what I think too.
Can we please get the sa
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:29:40 -0800
> 161.30.105.72.ftp-data > 192.168.128.101.32792: . ack 1 win 64000
> 192.168.128.101.32792 > 161.30.105.72.ftp-data: . 1:1381(1380) ack 1 win 5840
> 192.168.128.101.32792 > 161.30.105.72.ftp-data: . 1381:2761(1380)
Begin forwarded message:
> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 03:01:49 -0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Bug 5610] New: IP MTU Path Discovery now working properly
>
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5610
>
>Summary
