Herbert Xu wrote:
Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
case NETDEV_GOING_DOWN:
case NETDEV_DOWN:
/* Find every socket on this device and kill it. */
This brings up the question as to why we need to flush it on
NETDEV_GOING_DOWN
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 10:41:51 +
Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Herbert Xu wrote:
Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
case NETDEV_GOING_DOWN:
case NETDEV_DOWN:
/* Find every socket on this device and kill it. */
* Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060309 12:19]:
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 01:24:06 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 6197] New: unregister_netdevice: waiting for ppp9
to become free. Usage count = 658
http
From: Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 23:56:39 +0200
We need to remove all references to the device when we receive the
NETDEV_UNREGISTER notification.
Signed-off-by: Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good spotting Baruch. Once this gets a positive test result
I'll apply
Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
case NETDEV_GOING_DOWN:
case NETDEV_DOWN:
/* Find every socket on this device and kill it. */
This brings up the question as to why we need to flush it on
NETDEV_GOING_DOWN and NETDEV_DOWN as
