Re: [GENETLINK] some thoughts on the usage

2007-08-16 Thread Richard MUSIL
Thomas Graf wrote: > * Richard MUSIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-08-10 10:45 >> I have noticed that although ops for each family are the same (each >> device is functionally same) I cannot use same genl_ops struct for >> registration, because it uses internal member to link in list. Therefore >> it is

Re: [GENETLINK] some thoughts on the usage

2007-08-15 Thread Thomas Graf
* Richard MUSIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-08-10 10:45 > I have noticed that although ops for each family are the same (each > device is functionally same) I cannot use same genl_ops struct for > registration, because it uses internal member to link in list. Therefore > it is necessary to allocate ne

[GENETLINK] some thoughts on the usage

2007-08-10 Thread Richard MUSIL
Hello all, I am currently writing virtual TPM device driver. This is supposed to behave the same way as normal TPM but instead sending commands to hardware device, it will pass them back to user space. Probably similar in concept to tun/tap but with the difference it has nothing to do with network