On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:59:45 +0900
Masahide NAKAMURA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Miller wrote:
commit 0844565fb8a9418f5a860aa480c1aef70319c9a2
Author: Thomas Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Aug 4 23:05:56 2006 -0700
[NET]: Move netlink interface bits to linux/if.h
I applied a combined patch to fix all the headers to iproute2 (for the future
2.6.19 based release).
--
Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
David Miller wrote:
commit 0844565fb8a9418f5a860aa480c1aef70319c9a2
Author: Thomas Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Aug 4 23:05:56 2006 -0700
[NET]: Move netlink interface bits to linux/if.h
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: David S.
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:08:00 +0900 (JST)
[XFRM]: Do not add a state whose SPI is zero to the SPI hash.
SPI=0 is used for acquired IPsec SA and MIPv6
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:36:45 -0700
Please figure out how to keep rtnetlink.h useful from user space.
I tried putting the current sanitized version of rtnetlink.h into
iproute2 and the build fails.
Please give the error so I have a chance of fixing
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:36:45 -0700
Please figure out how to keep rtnetlink.h useful from user space.
I tried putting the current sanitized version of rtnetlink.h
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:50:52 -0700
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:36:45 -0700
Please figure out how to keep rtnetlink.h
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:50:52 -0700
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:27:04 -0700
It got added by this:
commit 0844565fb8a9418f5a860aa480c1aef70319c9a2
Author: Thomas Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Aug 4 23:05:56 2006 -0700
[NET]: Move netlink interface bits to linux/if.h
David Miller wrote:
commit 0844565fb8a9418f5a860aa480c1aef70319c9a2
Author: Thomas Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Aug 4 23:05:56 2006 -0700
[NET]: Move netlink interface bits to linux/if.h
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:08:00 +0900 (JST)
[XFRM]: Do not add a state whose SPI is zero to the SPI hash.
SPI=0 is used for acquired IPsec SA and MIPv6 RO state.
Such state should not be added to the SPI hash
because we do not
* YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-21 14:30
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:57:46 +0200), Thomas
Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
Same here, it doesn't make sense to export macros only of functional
value and used by userspace only. The same issue
Hello.
Please pull the following changesets available at:
git://git.skbuff.net/gitroot/yoshfuji/net-2.6.19-20060918-net/
HEADLINES
-
[XFRM]: Do not add a state whose SPI is zero to the SPI hash.
[NET]: Move netlink interface bits to linux/if_link.h.
[NET]: Include
* YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-19 00:08
[NET]: Move netlink interface bits to linux/if_link.h.
Moving netlink interface bits to linux/if.h is rather troublesome for
applications including both linux/if.h (which was changed to be included
from
14 matches
Mail list logo
