Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue 08/10] ixgbe: process the Tx ipsec offload

2017-12-06 Thread Shannon Nelson
On 12/5/2017 10:13 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Shannon Nelson wrote: If the skb has a security association referenced in the skb, then set up the Tx descriptor with the ipsec offload bits. While we're here, we fix an oddly named field in the context descriptor st

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue 08/10] ixgbe: process the Tx ipsec offload

2017-12-07 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Shannon Nelson wrote: > On 12/5/2017 10:13 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Shannon Nelson >> wrote: >>> >>> If the skb has a security association referenced in the skb, then >>> set up the Tx descriptor with the ipsec offload bits.

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue 08/10] ixgbe: process the Tx ipsec offload

2017-12-07 Thread Shannon Nelson
On 12/7/2017 9:56 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: You've suggested several things here, all good things to look into, which I will do, most now, some in the near future. Thanks! sln On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Shannon Nelson wrote: On 12/5/2017 10:13 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: On Mon, Dec

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue 08/10] ixgbe: process the Tx ipsec offload

2017-12-05 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Shannon Nelson wrote: > If the skb has a security association referenced in the skb, then > set up the Tx descriptor with the ipsec offload bits. While we're > here, we fix an oddly named field in the context descriptor struct. > > Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson >