Patrick McHardy wrote:
> [NET]: Fix fib_rules compatibility breakage
I forgot to remove FRA_SRC/FRA_DST from fib6_rule_policy.
Updated patch attached.
[NET]: Fix fib_rules compatibility breakage
The fib_rules netlink attribute policy introduced in 2.6.19 broke
userspace compatibilty. When specif
Thomas Graf wrote:
> * Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-03-19 06:54
>
>>Thomas, I can't see a clean way to fix this right now that
>>doesn't either bloat struct nla_policy or removes FRA_SRC/FRA_DST
>>from the policy, could you please look into this? Thanks.
>
>
> I guess the only way is
* Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-03-19 06:54
> Thomas, I can't see a clean way to fix this right now that
> doesn't either bloat struct nla_policy or removes FRA_SRC/FRA_DST
> from the policy, could you please look into this? Thanks.
I guess the only way is to remove FRA_SRC/FRA_DST from
Luciano Ruete wrote:
> After an:
> # ip ru flush
> I loose all my ip rules but the priority 0 one.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ip ru
> 0: from all lookup 255
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#
>
> Ok with that, but now i'm not able to insert any new rule.
> This leads to a total loose of conectivity.
>
>
