On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 11:14 +0300, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> So, very close to "as before": 900Mbps UDP, 750 TCP.
> But still, I was expecting performance improvements from latest ath10k
> code, not regressions.
> I know that hw is capable of 800Mbps TCP, which I'm targeting.
One flow can reach
Hi David,
On May 16, 2016 10:46:25 AM GMT+02:00, David Lang wrote:
>On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>
>> On 16 May 2016 at 11:12, David Lang wrote:
>>> On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>>>
On 6 May 2016 at 22:43, Dave Taht
On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 16 May 2016 at 11:12, David Lang wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 6 May 2016 at 22:43, Dave Taht wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Roman Yeryomin
wrote:
On 16 May 2016 at 11:12, David Lang wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>
>> On 6 May 2016 at 22:43, Dave Taht wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Roman Yeryomin
>>> wrote:
On 6 May 2016 at 21:43,
On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 6 May 2016 at 22:43, Dave Taht wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 6 May 2016 at 21:43, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 6 May 2016 at 15:47, Jesper