David Miller wrote:
From: Rick Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:54:00 -0800
So we're not disallowing a backlog argument of zero to
listen(). We'll accept that just fine, the only thing that
happens is that you'll get what you ask for, that being
no connections :-)
I'm
Please can you reconsider the patch regarding the accept_queue
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.22.git;a=commit;h=8488df894d05d6fa41c2bd298c335f944bb0e401
It disallows to set a `backlog' argument to listen(2) of zero. Using
a zero backlog is often done (e.g. ttcp), and
From: Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:32:09 +
Please can you reconsider the patch regarding the accept_queue
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.22.git;a=commit;h=8488df894d05d6fa41c2bd298c335f944bb0e401
It disallows to set a `backlog'
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:37:06 -0800 (PST)
Everything I've ever seen clearly states that a backlog of
zero means that zero connections are allowed.
So we're not disallowing a backlog argument of zero to
listen(). We'll accept that just fine, the only
So we're not disallowing a backlog argument of zero to
listen(). We'll accept that just fine, the only thing that
happens is that you'll get what you ask for, that being
no connections :-)
I'm not sure where HP-UX inherited the 0 = 1 bit - perhaps from BSD, nor
am I sure there is official
From: Rick Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:54:00 -0800
So we're not disallowing a backlog argument of zero to
listen(). We'll accept that just fine, the only thing that
happens is that you'll get what you ask for, that being
no connections :-)
I'm not sure where
