On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 11:56:04PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 01:37:01 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 11:07:07AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
So I posted this patch after 19:00 PST on 15 Dec.
Dec 15 13:44:39 syntropy kernel: #0:
Hello,
Surprise surprise. The namespace seq patch missed two spots in
AF_PACKET.
[PACKET]: Fix /proc/net/packet crash due to bogus private pointer
The seq_open_net patch changed the meaning of seq-private.
Unfortunately it missed two spots in AF_PACKET, which still
used the old way
From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 11:41:20 +0800
[PACKET]: Fix /proc/net/packet crash due to bogus private pointer
The seq_open_net patch changed the meaning of seq-private.
Unfortunately it missed two spots in AF_PACKET, which still
used the old way of dereferencing
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:10:14 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 16, 2007 3:19 AM, Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 11:56:04PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 01:37:01 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 11:07:07AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
I suspect namespace borkage. But just because you pin-pointed
my patch I'll try to track it down :)
Surprise surprise. The namespace seq patch missed two spots in
AF_PACKET.
[PACKET]: Fix /proc/net/packet crash due to bogus private
patch I'll try to track it down :)
Surprise surprise. The namespace seq patch missed two spots in
AF_PACKET.
[PACKET]: Fix /proc/net/packet crash due to bogus private pointer
The seq_open_net patch changed the meaning of seq-private.
Unfortunately it missed two spots in AF_PACKET
