Re: [PATCH,RFC] ep93xx_eth: conversion to phylib framework

2008-02-24 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 09:21:53AM +0100, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: > > > Currently, the ep93xx_eth driver doesn't care about the PHY state, > > > but it should, in order to tell the MAC when full duplex operation is > > > required; failure to do so causes degraded performance on full duplex >

Re: [PATCH,RFC] ep93xx_eth: conversion to phylib framework

2008-02-24 Thread Herbert Valerio Riedel
hello * On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 11:54 -0600, Andy Fleming wrote: > On Nov 16, 2007, at 03:38, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: > > > Currently, the ep93xx_eth driver doesn't care about the PHY state, > > but it should, in order to tell the MAC when full duplex operation is > > required; failure to do

Re: [PATCH,RFC] ep93xx_eth: conversion to phylib framework

2007-11-21 Thread Andy Fleming
On Nov 16, 2007, at 03:38, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: Currently, the ep93xx_eth driver doesn't care about the PHY state, but it should, in order to tell the MAC when full duplex operation is required; failure to do so causes degraded performance on full duplex links. This patch implements pr

[PATCH,RFC] ep93xx_eth: conversion to phylib framework

2007-11-16 Thread Herbert Valerio Riedel
Currently, the ep93xx_eth driver doesn't care about the PHY state, but it should, in order to tell the MAC when full duplex operation is required; failure to do so causes degraded performance on full duplex links. This patch implements proper PHY handling via the phylib framework: - clean up ep93