On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 09:13 +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:26:44 -0700 (PDT)),
> David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
> > From: Sridhar Samudrala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:17:28 -0700
> >
> > > The check
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:26:44 -0700 (PDT)),
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> From: Sridhar Samudrala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:17:28 -0700
>
> > The check for length in rawv6_sendmsg() is incorrect.
> > As len is an unsigned int, (len
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 14:26:44 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Sridhar Samudrala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:17:28 -0700
>
> > The check for length in rawv6_sendmsg() is incorrect.
> > As len is an unsigned int, (len < 0) will never be TRUE.
> > I think checking for IPV6_M
From: Sridhar Samudrala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:17:28 -0700
> The check for length in rawv6_sendmsg() is incorrect.
> As len is an unsigned int, (len < 0) will never be TRUE.
> I think checking for IPV6_MAXPLEN(65535) is better.
>
> Is it possible to send ipv6 jumbo packets
The check for length in rawv6_sendmsg() is incorrect.
As len is an unsigned int, (len < 0) will never be TRUE.
I think checking for IPV6_MAXPLEN(65535) is better.
Is it possible to send ipv6 jumbo packets using raw
sockets? If so, we can remove this check.
Thanks
Sridhar
Signed-off-by: Sridhar S
