From: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:56:14 +0300
> The _find calls calculate the hash value using the
> xfrm_state_hmask, without the xfrm_state_lock. But the
> value of this mask can change in the _resize call under
> the state_lock, so we risk to fail in finding
The _find calls calculate the hash value using the
xfrm_state_hmask, without the xfrm_state_lock. But the
value of this mask can change in the _resize call under
the state_lock, so we risk to fail in finding the desired
entry in hash.
I think, that the hash value is better to calculate
under th