It isn't, I just hadn't seen that and it wasn't in my git pull. Someone
had commented to me that "hey, did that ever get pushed up?" and at a
glance it hadn't.
Sorry for the noise, both patches seem to achieve the same ends.
-m
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 09:58:35PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
>
Mike,
Please explain why the patch below is any better/worse than the
patch here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=112997172112090&w=2
Thanks!
John
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 01:47:00PM -0500, Mike Kershaw wrote:
> Josh Wright and I encountered this doing rawtx experiements
Josh Wright and I encountered this doing rawtx experiements some time
ago. I bounced it to the prism54 guys but it must have gotten lost in
the shuffle and we just noticed that it's still in the latest kernel so
here we go again.
PROBLEM:
Prism54 assumes frames must be at least ETH_ZLEN in size,
