On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:59:58 +1100 Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason why these bugs should be treated gently? The
caller might not want to check NR_IRQS and IRQ_NOREQUEST cases, but
a NULL handler or NULL dev_id w/ shared are coding bugs.
Signed-off-by: Rusty
On Thursday 24 January 2008 09:04:14 Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:59:58 +1100 Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If no driver is passing in args which will trigger this BUG, we presumably
don't need the patch.
You're only thinking of current code. The BUG catches future changes,
Is there any reason why these bugs should be treated gently? The
caller might not want to check NR_IRQS and IRQ_NOREQUEST cases, but
a NULL handler or NULL dev_id w/ shared are coding bugs.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
kernel/irq/manage.c |7 +++
1 file changed, 3
