Re: [PATCH] Documentation/networking: more accurate LCO explanation

2016-05-06 Thread David Miller
From: Alexander Duyck Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 09:29:56 -0700 > I don't really see the point of using an underscore before and after > that statement. If it was only one or two words it might work for > emphasis but the statement is large enough that starting it with an > underscore just makes it h

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/networking: more accurate LCO explanation

2016-05-06 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Shmulik Ladkani wrote: > In few places the term "ones-complement sum" was used but the actual > meaning is "the complement of the ones-complement sum". Looks like there might still be a few minor corrections needed. Comments inline below. > > Signed-off-by: Shmuli

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/networking: more accurate LCO explanation

2016-05-06 Thread Edward Cree
On 06/05/16 16:57, Shmulik Ladkani wrote: > In few places the term "ones-complement sum" was used but the actual > meaning is "the complement of the ones-complement sum". > > Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani Acked-by: Edward Cree

[PATCH] Documentation/networking: more accurate LCO explanation

2016-05-06 Thread Shmulik Ladkani
In few places the term "ones-complement sum" was used but the actual meaning is "the complement of the ones-complement sum". Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani --- I assume readers interpret the term "ones-complement sum" as the sum using one's complement arithmentic, without the final bitwise co