Hello,
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Simon Horman wrote:
So, as long as these entries are not
accessible from sysctl it is safe to run without strategy handler but if
values can be changed then we will need strategy handler to
properly call update_defense_level() as done in
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 02:45:00AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Christian Borntraeger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:29:58 +0100
Running the latest git code I get the following messages during boot:
sysctl table check failed: /net/ipv4/vs/drop_entry .3.5.21.4 Missing
Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Christian, Hi Dave,
I have indeed been looking into this of late. Assuming that you use of
CTL_UNNUMBERED is correct, this patch looks fine to me. Acked.
I was planning to do the same and also switch over all the other entries
over to use
Hello,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Simon Horman wrote:
Running the latest git code I get the following messages during boot:
sysctl table check failed: /net/ipv4/vs/drop_entry .3.5.21.4 Missing
strategy
[...]
sysctl table check failed: /net/ipv4/vs/drop_packet
Julian Anastasov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I assume /proc/sys is still valid place, only sysctl interface
is scheduled for removal.
Yes. The ascii versions of the sysctls that show up in /proc/sys are
definitely still valid.
So, as long as these entries are not
accessible from sysctl
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 02:38:32AM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
Hi Julian,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Simon Horman wrote:
[snip]
As for the commented out entries. They are supposed to be exposed by
some other means - I believe the thinking was to comply with the don't
expose stuff in proc
Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 02:38:32AM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
Hi Julian,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Simon Horman wrote:
[snip]
As for the commented out entries. They are supposed to be exposed by
some other means - I believe the thinking was to
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:25:00PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 02:38:32AM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
Hi Julian,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Simon Horman wrote:
[snip]
As for the commented out entries. They are
Running the latest git code I get the following messages during boot:
sysctl table check failed: /net/ipv4/vs/drop_entry .3.5.21.4 Missing strategy
[...]
sysctl table check failed: /net/ipv4/vs/drop_packet .3.5.21.5 Missing strategy
[...]
sysctl table check failed:
From: Christian Borntraeger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:29:58 +0100
Running the latest git code I get the following messages during boot:
sysctl table check failed: /net/ipv4/vs/drop_entry .3.5.21.4 Missing strategy
[...]
sysctl table check failed:
10 matches
Mail list logo