YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 a écrit :
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:40:18 +0100), Eric Dumazet
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
nl_pid_hash_alloc() is renamed to nl_pid_hash_zalloc().
It is now returning zeroed memory to its callers.
I do think you do not need (and you should
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:40:18 +0100), Eric
Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> nl_pid_hash_alloc() is renamed to nl_pid_hash_zalloc().
> It is now returning zeroed memory to its callers.
I do think you do not need (and you should not) rename it
because XXX_zalloc()
nl_pid_hash_alloc() is renamed to nl_pid_hash_zalloc().
It is now returning zeroed memory to its callers.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index 2e02b19..dbd7cad 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink
