From: jamal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:54:48 -0500
On Mon, 2008-18-02 at 21:46 -0800, David Miller wrote:
Can some u32 expert review this?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdevm=120178638323045w=2
Fair enough.
Dzianis, please provide the feedback Jamal is asking for.
--
To
On Mon, 2008-18-02 at 21:46 -0800, David Miller wrote:
Can some u32 expert review this?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdevm=120178638323045w=2
cheers,
jamal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Dzianis Kahanovich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:16:30 -0200
Currently fine u32 hashkey ... at ... not work with relative offsets.
There are simpliest fix to use eat.
So the question is whether 'sel' is defined to be calculated
before all offsets and EAT operations are
On Wed, 2008-30-01 at 11:31 -0200, Dzianis Kahanovich wrote:
Currently fine u32 hashkey ... at ... not work with relative offsets.
There are simpliest fix to use eat.
(sorry, v2)
Hi,
Please send me the commands you are trying to run that motivated this
patch.
cheers,
jamal
--
To
Currently fine u32 hashkey ... at ... not work with relative offsets.
There are simpliest fix to use eat.
--
WBR,
Denis Kaganovich, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mahatma.bspu.unibel.by
diff -pruN linux-2.6.orig/net/sched/cls_u32.c linux-2.6/net/sched/cls_u32.c
--- linux-2.6.orig/net/sched/cls_u32.c
Currently fine u32 hashkey ... at ... not work with relative offsets.
There are simpliest fix to use eat.
(sorry, i'm idiot)
--
WBR,
Denis Kaganovich, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mahatma.bspu.unibel.by
diff -pruN linux-2.6.orig/net/sched/cls_u32.c linux-2.6/net/sched/cls_u32.c
---
Currently fine u32 hashkey ... at ... not work with relative offsets.
There are simpliest fix to use eat.
(sorry, v2)
--
WBR,
Denis Kaganovich, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mahatma.bspu.unibel.by
diff -pruN linux-2.6.orig/net/sched/cls_u32.c linux-2.6/net/sched/cls_u32.c
---
