On 05/22/2017 06:27 PM, David Miller wrote:
[...]
Ok I understand the issue now. Thanks for explaining.
I guess a hard-coded value of 2 and an adjusted comment above the
assignment of ip_align is the way to go.
I'll push the following, thanks everyone:
net: Make IP alignm
From: Daniel Borkmann
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 16:52:24 +0200
> On 05/22/2017 04:38 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
>> Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 09:07:46 -0500
>>
>>> Execution cannot reach NET_IP_ALIGN inside the following statement:
>>> ip_align = strict ? 2 : NET_IP_ALIGN
>>
On 05/22/2017 04:38 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 09:07:46 -0500
Execution cannot reach NET_IP_ALIGN inside the following statement:
ip_align = strict ? 2 : NET_IP_ALIGN
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1409762
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
NOTE: v
Hi David,
Quoting David Miller :
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 09:07:46 -0500
Execution cannot reach NET_IP_ALIGN inside the following statement:
ip_align = strict ? 2 : NET_IP_ALIGN
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1409762
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
NOTE: variable i
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 09:07:46 -0500
> Execution cannot reach NET_IP_ALIGN inside the following statement:
> ip_align = strict ? 2 : NET_IP_ALIGN
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1409762
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
> ---
> NOTE: variable ip_align could also be re
Execution cannot reach NET_IP_ALIGN inside the following statement:
ip_align = strict ? 2 : NET_IP_ALIGN
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1409762
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
NOTE: variable ip_align could also be removed and use value 2 directly.
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
