On Thu 2018-12-06 12:21:59, David Miller wrote:
>
> Plain "printk" are never appropriate.
>
> Please explicitly use pr_warn() or similar. If there is a device context
> available, either a generic device or a netdev, use one of the dev_*()
> or netdev_*() variants.
Can do, I guess is
Plain "printk" are never appropriate.
Please explicitly use pr_warn() or similar. If there is a device context
available, either a generic device or a netdev, use one of the dev_*()
or netdev_*() variants.
Errors communicating with the chip are not expected, warn about them.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.c
index 65f10fec25b3..f43104f48dbb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.c
@@ -30,8
