Re: [PATCH] mwifiex: MAC randomization should not be persistent

2017-04-13 Thread Kalle Valo
Brian Norris writes: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 07:02:15AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Brian Norris writes: >> >> > nl80211 provides the NL80211_SCAN_FLAG_RANDOM_ADDR for every scan >> > request that should be randomized; the absence of such a flag means we >> > should not randomize. However, mw

Re: [PATCH] mwifiex: MAC randomization should not be persistent

2017-04-06 Thread Brian Norris
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 07:02:15AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Brian Norris writes: > > > nl80211 provides the NL80211_SCAN_FLAG_RANDOM_ADDR for every scan > > request that should be randomized; the absence of such a flag means we > > should not randomize. However, mwifiex was stashing the latest

Re: [PATCH] mwifiex: MAC randomization should not be persistent

2017-04-05 Thread Kalle Valo
Brian Norris writes: > nl80211 provides the NL80211_SCAN_FLAG_RANDOM_ADDR for every scan > request that should be randomized; the absence of such a flag means we > should not randomize. However, mwifiex was stashing the latest > randomization request and *always* using it for future scans, even t

[PATCH] mwifiex: MAC randomization should not be persistent

2017-04-05 Thread Brian Norris
nl80211 provides the NL80211_SCAN_FLAG_RANDOM_ADDR for every scan request that should be randomized; the absence of such a flag means we should not randomize. However, mwifiex was stashing the latest randomization request and *always* using it for future scans, even those that didn't set the flag.