On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 15:19 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 09:33:26AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 May 2018, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:49:11AM +, Israel Rukshin wrote:
> > > > Adding the vector offset when calling to mlx5_ve
On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 09:33:26AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 5 May 2018, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:49:11AM +, Israel Rukshin wrote:
> > > Adding the vector offset when calling to mlx5_vector2eqn() is wrong.
> > > This is because mlx5_vector2eqn() check
On Sun, 6 May 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 5 May 2018, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK
> > > - mask = irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(&desc->irq_data);
> > > -#else
> > > - mask = desc->irq_common_data.affinity;
> > > -#endif
> > > - return ma
On Sat, 5 May 2018, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:49:11AM +, Israel Rukshin wrote:
> > Adding the vector offset when calling to mlx5_vector2eqn() is wrong.
> > This is because mlx5_vector2eqn() checks if EQ index is equal to vector
> > number
> > and the fact that the inte
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:49:11AM +, Israel Rukshin wrote:
> Adding the vector offset when calling to mlx5_vector2eqn() is wrong.
> This is because mlx5_vector2eqn() checks if EQ index is equal to vector number
> and the fact that the internal completion vectors that mlx5 allocates
> don't get
