Hi Marcin,
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:49:19 +0200 Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> Hi Jisheng,
>
> 2016-03-31 7:53 GMT+02:00 Jisheng Zhang :
> > Hi Gregory,
> >
> > On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:11:41 +0200 Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Jisheng,
> >>
> >> On mer., mars 30 2016, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >>
>
Hi Jisheng,
2016-03-31 7:53 GMT+02:00 Jisheng Zhang :
> Hi Gregory,
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:11:41 +0200 Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>
>> Hi Jisheng,
>>
>> On mer., mars 30 2016, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>>
>> > The mvneta BM can't work on 64bit platform, as the BM hardware expects
>> > buf virtual add
Hi Gregory,
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:11:41 +0200 Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Jisheng,
>
> On mer., mars 30 2016, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>
> > The mvneta BM can't work on 64bit platform, as the BM hardware expects
> > buf virtual address to be placed in the first four bytes of mapped
> > buffer,
Hi Jisheng,
On mer., mars 30 2016, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> The mvneta BM can't work on 64bit platform, as the BM hardware expects
> buf virtual address to be placed in the first four bytes of mapped
> buffer, but obviously the virtual address on 64bit platform can't be
> stored in 4 bytes. So w
The mvneta BM can't work on 64bit platform, as the BM hardware expects
buf virtual address to be placed in the first four bytes of mapped
buffer, but obviously the virtual address on 64bit platform can't be
stored in 4 bytes. So we have to explicitly disable BM on 64bit
platform.
Signed-off-by: Ji