Re: [PATCH] net: take care of bonding in build_skb_flow_key (v3)

2016-01-20 Thread Wengang Wang
在 2016年01月21日 12:05, Jay Vosburgh 写道: Wengang Wang wrote: [...] For ipip, yes seems update_pmtu is called in line for each call of queue_xmit. Do you know if it's a good configuration for ipip + bonding? Yes, it is. Other's comment and suggestion?

Re: [PATCH] net: take care of bonding in build_skb_flow_key (v3)

2016-01-20 Thread Wengang Wang
在 2016年01月20日 23:18, Sabrina Dubroca 写道: 2016-01-20, 13:32:13 +0800, Wengang Wang wrote: In a bonding setting, we determines fragment size according to MTU and PMTU associated to the bonding master. If the slave finds the fragment size is too big, it drops the fragment and calls

Re: [PATCH] net: take care of bonding in build_skb_flow_key (v3)

2016-01-20 Thread Wengang Wang
在 2016年01月20日 17:56, zhuyj 写道: On 01/20/2016 05:47 PM, Wengang Wang wrote: 在 2016年01月20日 15:54, zhuyj 写道: On 01/20/2016 03:38 PM, Wengang Wang wrote: 在 2016年01月20日 14:24, zhuyj 写道: On 01/20/2016 01:32 PM, Wengang Wang wrote: In a bonding setting, we determines fragment size according

Re: [PATCH] net: take care of bonding in build_skb_flow_key (v3)

2016-01-20 Thread Jay Vosburgh
Wengang Wang wrote: [...] >For ipip, yes seems update_pmtu is called in line for each call of >queue_xmit. Do you know if it's a good configuration for ipip + bonding? Yes, it is. >Other's comment and suggestion? I agree with Sabrina Dubroca

Re: [PATCH] net: take care of bonding in build_skb_flow_key (v3)

2016-01-20 Thread Sabrina Dubroca
2016-01-20, 13:32:13 +0800, Wengang Wang wrote: > In a bonding setting, we determines fragment size according to MTU and > PMTU associated to the bonding master. If the slave finds the fragment > size is too big, it drops the fragment and calls ip_rt_update_pmtu(), > passing _skb_ and _pmtu_,