Re: [PATCH] spidernet: Fix problem sending IP fragments

2007-03-12 Thread Norbert Eicker
On Monday, 12. March 2007 09:28, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Norbert Eicker wrote: On Friday, 9. March 2007 17:53, Jeff Garzik wrote: Linas Vepstas wrote: Please apply. The rather long patch description is from the submitter, Norbert Eicker, I don't know if that's

Re: [PATCH] spidernet: Fix problem sending IP fragments

2007-03-12 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Norbert Eicker wrote: On Monday, 12. March 2007 09:28, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Norbert Eicker wrote: On Friday, 9. March 2007 17:53, Jeff Garzik wrote: Linas Vepstas wrote: Please apply. The rather long patch description is from the

Re: [PATCH] spidernet: Fix problem sending IP fragments

2007-03-12 Thread Norbert Eicker
On Monday, 12. March 2007 11:44, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Norbert Eicker wrote: On Monday, 12. March 2007 09:28, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Norbert Eicker wrote: On Friday, 9. March 2007 17:53, Jeff Garzik wrote: Linas Vepstas wrote:

Re: [PATCH] spidernet: Fix problem sending IP fragments

2007-03-09 Thread Jeff Garzik
Linas Vepstas wrote: Jeff, Please apply. The rather long patch description is from the submitter, Norbert Eicker, I don't know if that's alright, or if I should ask to have it trimmed. Thanks, --linas From: Norbert Eicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] I found out that the spidernet-driver is unable

Re: [PATCH] spidernet: Fix problem sending IP fragments

2007-03-09 Thread Norbert Eicker
On Friday, 9. March 2007 17:53, Jeff Garzik wrote: Linas Vepstas wrote: Jeff, Please apply. The rather long patch description is from the submitter, Norbert Eicker, I don't know if that's alright, or if I should ask to have it trimmed. Thanks, --linas From: Norbert Eicker

[PATCH] spidernet: Fix problem sending IP fragments

2007-03-08 Thread Linas Vepstas
Jeff, Please apply. The rather long patch description is from the submitter, Norbert Eicker, I don't know if that's alright, or if I should ask to have it trimmed. Thanks, --linas From: Norbert Eicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] I found out that the spidernet-driver is unable to send fragmented IP

Re: [PATCH] spidernet: Fix problem sending IP fragments

2007-03-03 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Geoff, I suspect gelic_net might have the same problem... Cheers, Ben. On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 18:39 +0100, Norbert Eicker wrote: On Fri 2.3.2007 00:34, Linas Vepstas wrote: On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 04:52:54PM -0600, Chris Engel wrote: I tried to apply this patch to 2.6.21-rc2 and CHECKSUM_HW

Re: [PATCH] spidernet: Fix problem sending IP fragments

2007-03-02 Thread Norbert Eicker
On Fri 2.3.2007 00:34, Linas Vepstas wrote: On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 04:52:54PM -0600, Chris Engel wrote: I tried to apply this patch to 2.6.21-rc2 and CHECKSUM_HW appears to be changed to CHECKSUM_COMPLETE Oops. I did not test this on the actual 2.6.21-rc2 before sending it. It worked fine

[PATCH] spidernet: Fix problem sending IP fragments

2007-02-28 Thread Norbert Eicker
Hi, I found out that the spidernet-driver is unable to send fragmented IP frames. Let me just recall the basic structure of normal UDP/IP/Ethernet frames (that actually work): - It starts with the Ethernet header (dest MAC, src MAC, etc.) - The next part is occupied by the IP header (version