Linas-san,
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 05:48:08PM +0900, Ishizaki Kou wrote:
> > We intend this patch to improve spidernet interrupt handling to be
> > more strict. We had following problem and this patch solves it.
>
> Looks reasonable to me. I'll forward it upstream. In the future,
Thank you.
Linas Vepstas wrote:
From: Ishizaki Kou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We intend this patch to improve spidernet interrupt handling to be
more strict. We had following problem and this patch solves it.
-when CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ=y, request_irq() calls handler().
-when spider_net_open() is called, it call
From: Ishizaki Kou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We intend this patch to improve spidernet interrupt handling to be
more strict. We had following problem and this patch solves it.
-when CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ=y, request_irq() calls handler().
-when spider_net_open() is called, it calls request_irq() which
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 05:48:08PM +0900, Ishizaki Kou wrote:
> We intend this patch to improve spidernet interrupt handling to be
> more strict. We had following problem and this patch solves it.
Looks reasonable to me. I'll forward it upstream. In the future,
could you use "diff -Nupr"? it adds
We intend this patch to improve spidernet interrupt handling to be
more strict. We had following problem and this patch solves it.
-when CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ=y, request_irq() calls handler().
-when spider_net_open() is called, it calls request_irq() which calls
spider_net_interrupt().
-if some