Re: [PATCH -next] RDS: TCP: Fix non static symbol warnings

2016-06-17 Thread David Miller
From: weiyj...@163.com Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 18:12:46 + > From: Wei Yongjun > > Fixes the following sparse warnings: > > net/rds/tcp.c:59:5: warning: > symbol 'rds_tcp_min_sndbuf' was not declared. Should it be static? > net/rds/tcp.c:60:5: warning: >

Re: [PATCH -next] RDS: TCP: Fix non static symbol warnings

2016-06-17 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On 6/17/2016 11:12 AM, weiyj...@163.com wrote: From: Wei Yongjun Fixes the following sparse warnings: net/rds/tcp.c:59:5: warning: symbol 'rds_tcp_min_sndbuf' was not declared. Should it be static? net/rds/tcp.c:60:5: warning: symbol 'rds_tcp_min_rcvbuf' was

Re: [PATCH -next] RDS: TCP: Fix non static symbol warnings

2016-06-17 Thread Sowmini Varadhan
On (06/17/16 18:12), weiyj...@163.com wrote: > From: Wei Yongjun > > Fixes the following sparse warnings: > > net/rds/tcp.c:59:5: warning: > symbol 'rds_tcp_min_sndbuf' was not declared. Should it be static? > net/rds/tcp.c:60:5: warning: > symbol

[PATCH -next] RDS: TCP: Fix non static symbol warnings

2016-06-17 Thread weiyj_lk
From: Wei Yongjun Fixes the following sparse warnings: net/rds/tcp.c:59:5: warning: symbol 'rds_tcp_min_sndbuf' was not declared. Should it be static? net/rds/tcp.c:60:5: warning: symbol 'rds_tcp_min_rcvbuf' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: