Re: [PATCH 0/3 net-2.6.25] call FIB rule->action in the correct namespace

2008-01-20 Thread David Miller
From: "Denis V. Lunev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:08:51 +0300 > FIB rule->action should operate in the same namespace as fib_lookup. > This is definitely missed right now. > > There are two ways to implement this: pass struct net into another rules > API call (2 levels) or plac

Re: [PATCH 0/3 net-2.6.25] call FIB rule->action in the correct namespace

2008-01-17 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Denis V. Lunev wrote: FIB rule->action should operate in the same namespace as fib_lookup. This is definitely missed right now. There are two ways to implement this: pass struct net into another rules API call (2 levels) or place netns into rule struct directly. The second approach seems better

[PATCH 0/3 net-2.6.25] call FIB rule->action in the correct namespace

2008-01-17 Thread Denis V. Lunev
FIB rule->action should operate in the same namespace as fib_lookup. This is definitely missed right now. There are two ways to implement this: pass struct net into another rules API call (2 levels) or place netns into rule struct directly. The second approach seems better as the code will grow le