On Nov 19, 2007, at 7:30 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Kim Phillips wrote:
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 12:15:30 -0600
Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all,
the following patches fix RGMII timing for rev. 2.1 of the mpc8360,
according to erratum #2 (erratum text included below). Basically
the
> -Original Message-
> From: Phillips Kim
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 2:16 AM
> To: Li Yang-r58472; Kumar Gala; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PATCH 0/5] fixups for mpc8360 rev. 2.1 erratu
Kim Phillips wrote:
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 12:15:30 -0600
Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all,
the following patches fix RGMII timing for rev. 2.1 of the mpc8360,
according to erratum #2 (erratum text included below). Basically the
most intrusive part is the addition of two new RGMI
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 12:15:30 -0600
Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> the following patches fix RGMII timing for rev. 2.1 of the mpc8360,
> according to erratum #2 (erratum text included below). Basically the
> most intrusive part is the addition of two new RGMII Internal De
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 16:25:07 +0300
Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 01:11:35PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
> [...]
> > right, but whether it does or not doesn't affect your failure outcome
> > either I'm assuming.
> >
> > > > If it's something like 0x03, the u-bo
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 12:15:30PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> the following patches fix RGMII timing for rev. 2.1 of the mpc8360,
> according to erratum #2 (erratum text included below). Basically the
> most intrusive part is the addition of two new RGMII Internal Delay
> modes;
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 01:11:35PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
[...]
> right, but whether it does or not doesn't affect your failure outcome
> either I'm assuming.
>
> > > If it's something like 0x03, the u-boot patch will probably look like:
> > >
> > > if ((bcsr[12] == 0x10) &&
> > > (immr->
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 21:39:52 +0300
Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:15:08PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 17:16:11 +0300
> > Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 12:15:30PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:15:08PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 17:16:11 +0300
> Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 12:15:30PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > the following patches fix RGMII timing for rev. 2.1 of th
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 17:16:11 +0300
Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 12:15:30PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > the following patches fix RGMII timing for rev. 2.1 of the mpc8360,
> > according to erratum #2 (erratum text included below). Basic
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 12:15:30PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> the following patches fix RGMII timing for rev. 2.1 of the mpc8360,
> according to erratum #2 (erratum text included below). Basically the
> most intrusive part is the addition of two new RGMII Internal Delay
> modes;
Hello all,
the following patches fix RGMII timing for rev. 2.1 of the mpc8360,
according to erratum #2 (erratum text included below). Basically the
most intrusive part is the addition of two new RGMII Internal Delay
modes; one for TX delay only, and the other for RX delay only (i.e, not
both at t
12 matches
Mail list logo