Re: [PATCH 0/5] xen-netback: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

2016-01-04 Thread Wei Liu
I think the original code is fine. Wei. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 0/5] xen-netback: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

2016-01-04 Thread Dan Carpenter
The original code is fine. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 0/5] xen-netback: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

2016-01-02 Thread Joe Perches
On Sat, 2016-01-02 at 18:50 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > A few update suggestions were taken into account > from static source code analysis. While static analysis can be useful, I don't think these specific conversions are generally useful. Perhaps it would be more useful to convert the str

[PATCH 0/5] xen-netback: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

2016-01-02 Thread SF Markus Elfring
From: Markus Elfring Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 18:46:45 +0100 A few update suggestions were taken into account from static source code analysis. Markus Elfring (5): Delete an unnecessary assignment in connect_rings() Delete an unnecessary goto statement in connect_rings() Replace a variable in