Re: [PATCH 02/10] [TCP]: Extend reordering detection to cover CA_Loss partially

2007-11-15 Thread David Miller
From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:37:26 +0200 > This implements more accurately what is stated in sacktag's > overall comment: > > "Both of these heuristics are not used in Loss state, when >we cannot account for retransmits accurately." > > When CA_Loss s

[PATCH 02/10] [TCP]: Extend reordering detection to cover CA_Loss partially

2007-11-15 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
This implements more accurately what is stated in sacktag's overall comment: "Both of these heuristics are not used in Loss state, when we cannot account for retransmits accurately." When CA_Loss state is entered, the state changer ensures that undo_marker is only set if no TCPCB_RETRANS skb