From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:37:26 +0200
> This implements more accurately what is stated in sacktag's
> overall comment:
>
> "Both of these heuristics are not used in Loss state, when
>we cannot account for retransmits accurately."
>
> When CA_Loss s
This implements more accurately what is stated in sacktag's
overall comment:
"Both of these heuristics are not used in Loss state, when
we cannot account for retransmits accurately."
When CA_Loss state is entered, the state changer ensures that
undo_marker is only set if no TCPCB_RETRANS skb