On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Many years ago, when I worked on network drivers, (iirc)
> > PHY 0 was to be used only if no other PHYs were present,
> > so it should be checked last, not first.
>
> Hey, I should start the Janitor's Driver Development Documentation
> Proje
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 09:07:52AM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, John W. Linville wrote:
>
> > Hmmm...that seems odd. Of course, that is the way I had it before
> > Jeff told me to change it to probe PHY ID 0 last... :-)
>
> Many years ago, when I worked on network drivers, (
On 12/19/05, Randy.Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, John W. Linville wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:43:51PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:09:32AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > @@ -633,7 +643,7 @@ static int __dev
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:43:51PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:09:32AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> >
> > > > > @@ -633,7 +643,7 @@ static int __devinit sundance_probe1 (st
> > > > >
> > > > > np->phys[0] =
On 12/19/05, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/19/05, John W. Linville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:35:04PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 12:20:32PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > >
> > > > @@ -633,7
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 02:08:58PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On 12/19/05, John W. Linville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:35:04PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 12:20:32PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > >
> > > > @
On 12/19/05, John W. Linville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:35:04PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 12:20:32PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >
> > > @@ -633,7 +643,7 @@ static int __devinit sundance_probe1 (st
> > >
> > > np->phys
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:43:51PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:09:32AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
>
> > > > @@ -633,7 +643,7 @@ static int __devinit sundance_probe1 (st
> > > >
> > > > np->phys[0] = 1;/* Default setting */
> > > >
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:09:32AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> > > @@ -633,7 +643,7 @@ static int __devinit sundance_probe1 (st
> > >
> > > np->phys[0] = 1;/* Default setting */
> > > np->mii_preamble_required++;
> > > - for (phy = 1; phy <= 32 && phy_idx < MII_CNT; phy+
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:35:04PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 12:20:32PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
> > @@ -633,7 +643,7 @@ static int __devinit sundance_probe1 (st
> >
> > np->phys[0] = 1;/* Default setting */
> > np->mii_prea
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 12:20:32PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> @@ -633,7 +643,7 @@ static int __devinit sundance_probe1 (st
>
> np->phys[0] = 1;/* Default setting */
> np->mii_preamble_required++;
> - for (phy = 1; phy <= 32 && phy_idx < MII_CNT; phy+
Hi Jeff,
Yesterday I've bought an el-cheapo encore ENL832-TX-ICNT eth card,
sundance based, that didn't worked with the in-kernel sundance driver,
after some googling I've found this driver:
http://www.encore-usa.com/Drivers/ENL832-TX-ICNT_Drivers.zip
Merged some bits and got this beast workin
12 matches
Mail list logo
