On 21/06/15 20:27, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Sunday 21 June 2015 09:37:13 David Miller wrote:
>> From: Antonio Quartulli
>> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 21:06:23 +0200
>>
>>> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ batadv_gw_get_best_gw_node(struct batadv_priv
>>> *bat_priv)>
>>> struct batadv_neigh_node *router;
>>>
On Sunday 21 June 2015 09:37:13 David Miller wrote:
> From: Antonio Quartulli
> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 21:06:23 +0200
>
> > @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ batadv_gw_get_best_gw_node(struct batadv_priv
> > *bat_priv)>
> > struct batadv_neigh_node *router;
> > struct batadv_neigh_ifinfo *router_ifinf
From: Antonio Quartulli
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 21:06:23 +0200
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ batadv_gw_get_best_gw_node(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv)
> struct batadv_neigh_node *router;
> struct batadv_neigh_ifinfo *router_ifinfo;
> struct batadv_gw_node *gw_node, *curr_gw = NULL;
> -
From: Ruben Wisniewski
The gateway selection based on fast connections is using a single value
calculated from the average tq (0-255) and the download bandwidth (in
100Kibit). The formula for the first step (tq ** 2 * 1 * bandwidth)
tends to overflow a u32 with low bandwidth settings like 50
