From: Wolfram Sang
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 17:37:58 +0100
> From: Wolfram Sang
>
> This change will also make Coverity happy by avoiding a theoretical NULL
> pointer dereference; yet another reason is to use the above helper function
> to tighten the code and make it more readable.
>
> Signed-o
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang
>
> This change will also make Coverity happy by avoiding a theoretical NULL
> pointer dereference; yet another reason is to use the above helper function
> to tighten the code and make it more readable.
>
> Signed-off-by: W
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:37:58PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang
>
> This change will also make Coverity happy by avoiding a theoretical NULL
> pointer dereference; yet another reason is to use the above helper function
> to tighten the code and make it more readable.
>
> Signe
From: Wolfram Sang
This change will also make Coverity happy by avoiding a theoretical NULL
pointer dereference; yet another reason is to use the above helper function
to tighten the code and make it more readable.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
---
Compile tested only. I am on the road and don't