From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 22:49:22 -0700
> On Mon 27 Mar 16:04 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote:
>
>> From: Bjorn Andersson
>> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:58:37 -0700
>>
>> > I'm sorry, but I can't figure out how to reproduce this.
>>
>> All of my builds are "make allmodconfig" s
On Mon 27 Mar 16:04 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote:
> From: Bjorn Andersson
> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:58:37 -0700
>
> > I'm sorry, but I can't figure out how to reproduce this.
>
> All of my builds are "make allmodconfig" so it should be easy to reproduce.
Thanks, turns out that while it was p
From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:58:37 -0700
> I'm sorry, but I can't figure out how to reproduce this.
All of my builds are "make allmodconfig" so it should be easy to reproduce.
On Thu 23 Mar 16:56 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote:
> From: Bjorn Andersson
> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:57:33 -0700
>
> > On Wed 22 Mar 11:44 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote:
> >
> >> From: Bjorn Andersson
> >> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:35:42 -0700
> >>
> >> What is the status of the Kconfig depen
From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:57:33 -0700
> On Wed 22 Mar 11:44 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote:
>
>> From: Bjorn Andersson
>> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:35:42 -0700
>>
>> What is the status of the Kconfig dependency fix and how will I be
>> getting it?
>>
>
> There are two Kco
From: Marcel Holtmann
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:23:15 +0100
> Hi Dave,
>
>>> By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD
>>> API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol
>>> support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms.
>>>
>>> As the new (
On Wed 22 Mar 11:44 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote:
> From: Bjorn Andersson
> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:35:42 -0700
>
> > By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD
> > API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol
> > support found in the 820 and 83
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:44:39AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Bjorn Andersson
> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:35:42 -0700
>
> > By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD
> > API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol
> > support found in the
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 04:35:42PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD
> API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol
> support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms.
>
> As the new (RPMSG-based) and old
Hi Dave,
>> By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD
>> API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol
>> support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms.
>>
>> As the new (RPMSG-based) and old SMD implementations are mutually
>> exclusive we h
From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:35:42 -0700
> By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD
> API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol
> support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms.
>
> As the new (RPMSG-based) and old SMD
Marcel Holtmann writes:
>> By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD
>> API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol
>> support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms.
>>
>> As the new (RPMSG-based) and old SMD implementations are mutually
>
Hi Bjorn,
> By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD
> API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol
> support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms.
>
> As the new (RPMSG-based) and old SMD implementations are mutually
> exclusive we have t
By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD
API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol
support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms.
As the new (RPMSG-based) and old SMD implementations are mutually
exclusive we have to change all client dri
14 matches
Mail list logo