Hi Auke,
"Kok, Auke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/14/2007 02:58:14 AM:
> this doesn't apply anymore and it would help if you could re-spin this
for e1000e.
> I don't know what the status for merging of the batched xmit patches is
right now
> but it would help if you could rewrite them against
Krishna Kumar wrote:
> E1000: Implement batching capability (ported thanks to changes taken from
> Jamal).
>
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
this doesn't apply anymore and it would help if you could re-spin this for
e1000e.
I don't know what the status for merging of th
Hi Evgeniy,
Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/14/2007 06:17:14 PM:
> > if (unlikely(skb->len <= 0)) {
> >dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> > - return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> > + return NETDEV_TX_DROPPED;
> > }
>
> This changes could actually go as own patch, although not
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 02:34:42PM +0530, Krishna Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> @@ -3276,7 +3282,7 @@ e1000_xmit_frame(struct sk_buff *skb, st
>
> if (unlikely(skb->len <= 0)) {
> dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> - return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> + return NETDEV_
E1000: Implement batching capability (ported thanks to changes taken from
Jamal).
Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
e1000_main.c | 104 ++-
1 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff -ruNp org/driver
