On 27.07.16 17:08, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 07/27/2016 10:12 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:25:58PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 07/26/2016 03:02 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Allocating and preparing a dma descriptor doesn't need to happen under
the ch
On 07/27/2016 10:12 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:25:58PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> On 07/26/2016 03:02 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>> Allocating and preparing a dma descriptor doesn't need to happen under
>>> the channel's lock. So do this before ta
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:25:58PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 07/26/2016 03:02 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Allocating and preparing a dma descriptor doesn't need to happen under
> > the channel's lock. So do this before taking the channel's lock. The only
> > down side is that
On 07/26/2016 03:02 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Allocating and preparing a dma descriptor doesn't need to happen under
> the channel's lock. So do this before taking the channel's lock. The only
> down side is that the dma descriptor might be allocated even though the
> channel is about to be sto
Allocating and preparing a dma descriptor doesn't need to happen under
the channel's lock. So do this before taking the channel's lock. The only
down side is that the dma descriptor might be allocated even though the
channel is about to be stopped. This is unlikely though.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Klein
