Julian Calaby writes:
> Hi Kalle,
>
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Byeoungwook Kim writes:
>>
>>> rtl_*_delay() functions were reused same codes about addr variable.
>>> So i have converted to
Hi Kalle,
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Byeoungwook Kim writes:
>
>> rtl_*_delay() functions were reused same codes about addr variable.
>> So i have converted to rtl_addr_delay() from code about addr variable.
>>
>>
Byeoungwook Kim writes:
> rtl_*_delay() functions were reused same codes about addr variable.
> So i have converted to rtl_addr_delay() from code about addr variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Byeoungwook Kim
> Reviewed-by: Julian Calaby
Hi Byeoungwook,
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Byeoungwook Kim wrote:
> rtl_*_delay() functions were reused same codes about addr variable.
> So i have converted to rtl_addr_delay() from code about addr variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Byeoungwook Kim
>
Hi Julian,
I sent to modify the patch again.
Thanks for your assists!
Regards,
Byeoungwook
2016-02-03 11:06 GMT+09:00 Julian Calaby :
> Hi Byeoungwook,
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Byeoungwook Kim wrote:
>> rtl_*_delay() functions were
rtl_*_delay() functions were reused same codes about addr variable.
So i have converted to rtl_addr_delay() from code about addr variable.
Signed-off-by: Byeoungwook Kim
Reviewed-by: Julian Calaby
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c |