Ayaz Abdulla wrote:
Manfred Spraul wrote:
Ayaz Abdulla wrote:
if (nv_alloc_rx(dev)) {
-spin_lock(np-lock);
+spin_lock_irqsave(np-lock, flags);
Tiny point:
there is not need for irqsave(): we are in timer context, that
guarantees:
- bottom half disabled
-
Ayaz Abdulla wrote:
This patch fixes the issues with multiple irqs.
I am resending based on feedback. I decoupled the dma mask for
consistent memory and fixed leak with multiple irq in error path.
Thanks to Manfred for catching the spin lock problem.
Signed-Off-By: Ayaz Abdulla [EMAIL
This patch fixes the issues with multiple irqs.
I am resending based on feedback. I decoupled the dma mask for
consistent memory and fixed leak with multiple irq in error path.
Thanks to Manfred for catching the spin lock problem.
Signed-Off-By: Ayaz Abdulla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manfred Spraul wrote:
Ayaz Abdulla wrote:
if (nv_alloc_rx(dev)) {
-spin_lock(np-lock);
+spin_lock_irqsave(np-lock, flags);
Tiny point:
there is not need for irqsave(): we are in timer context, that guarantees:
- bottom half disabled
- interrupts enabled
Just use
Ayaz Abdulla wrote:
if (nv_alloc_rx(dev)) {
- spin_lock(np-lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(np-lock, flags);
Tiny point:
there is not need for irqsave(): we are in timer context, that guarantees:
- bottom half disabled
- interrupts enabled
Just use
This patch fixes the issues with multiple irqs.
Thanks to Manfred for catching the spin lock problem.
Signed-Off-By: Ayaz Abdulla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This email message is for the sole use of the intended
