On Wed, Dec 28, Dale Farnsworth wrote:
> From: Dale Farnsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> We can't call request_irq() while holding a spin lock.
This still calls malloc with the lock held. What is the lock trying to
protect anyway? Maybe the lock should be moved to the place where the
lock is real
From: Dale Farnsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We can't call request_irq() while holding a spin lock.
Signed-off-by: Dale Farnsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6-mv643xx_enet/drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.c
===
--- linux-2.6-mv643xx_en