Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 5/5] [RFC] Infiniband: connection abstraction

2006-01-18 Thread Roland Dreier
+struct ucma_file { +struct semaphoremutex; This should be a struct mutex instead, I think. +static DECLARE_MUTEX(ctx_mutex); Same here. - R. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 5/5] [RFC] Infiniband: connection abstraction

2006-01-18 Thread Roland Dreier
+UCMA_MAX_BACKLOG= 128 Is there any reason that we might want to make this a tunable? Maybe as a module parameter that's writable in sysfs... - R. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 5/5] [RFC] Infiniband: connection abstraction

2006-01-18 Thread Sean Hefty
Roland Dreier wrote: + UCMA_MAX_BACKLOG= 128 Is there any reason that we might want to make this a tunable? Maybe as a module parameter that's writable in sysfs... There's no reason not to make this tunable. - Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 5/5] [RFC] Infiniband: connection abstraction

2006-01-18 Thread Grant Grundler
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:19:01AM -0800, Sean Hefty wrote: Roland Dreier wrote: + UCMA_MAX_BACKLOG= 128 Is there any reason that we might want to make this a tunable? Maybe as a module parameter that's writable in sysfs... There's no reason not to make this tunable. Yes,

[PATCH 5/5] [RFC] Infiniband: connection abstraction

2006-01-17 Thread Sean Hefty
This patch adds the kernel component to support the userspace Infiniband/RDMA connection agent library. Signed-off-by: Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.git/Documentation/dontdiff linux-2.6.git/drivers/infiniband/core/Makefile