On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 01:34:55PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Shaohua Li
> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:03:37 -0700
>
> > + /* Since this is being sent on the wire obfuscate hash a bit
> > +* to minimize possbility that any useful information to an
> > +* attacker
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 04:12:53PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 1:34 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Shaohua Li
> > Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:03:37 -0700
> >
> >> + /* Since this is being sent on the wire obfuscate hash a bit
> >>
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 1:34 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Shaohua Li
> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:03:37 -0700
>
>> + /* Since this is being sent on the wire obfuscate hash a bit
>> + * to minimize possbility that any useful information to an
>> +
From: Shaohua Li
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:03:37 -0700
> + /* Since this is being sent on the wire obfuscate hash a bit
> + * to minimize possbility that any useful information to an
> + * attacker is leaked. Only lower 20 bits are relevant.
> + */
> +
From: Shaohua Li
Please see below tcpdump output:
21:00:48.109122 IP6 (flowlabel 0x43304, hlim 64, next-header TCP (6) payload
length: 40) fec0::5054:ff:fe12:3456.55804 > fec0::5054:ff:fe12:3456.: Flags
[S], cksum 0x0529 (incorrect -> 0xf56c), seq 3282214508, win 43690,